Bombay High Court
SHAIKH ASHFAK SHAIKH SALIMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The court suspended the six‑month sentence and granted bail to the appellant pending the final disposal of the appeal.
Summary
Shaikh Ashfak Shaikh Salim was convicted by the District Judge‑3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, under IPC Section 354(d) and sentenced to six months’ imprisonment and a fine, which has been paid. While the conviction is under appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 402 of 2026), the applicant sought suspension of the sentence and bail. The State and other respondents opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offence and potential misuse of liberty. The court noted the short term of imprisonment, the pending appeal, and the applicant’s residence in Hyderabad, and therefore allowed the application. The sentence was suspended pending final disposal of the appeal, and the applicant was released on a personal bond of Rs 15,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including periodic appearance before the trial court.
Issues considered
- Whether the sentence imposed under IPC Section 354(d) should be suspended pending the final hearing of the appeal.
- Whether bail should be granted to the convicted appellant pending the appeal.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 354(d)
Subjects
- bail
- suspension of sentence
- appeal pending
- IPC 354(d)
- criminal application
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42259
909-Cri-Apln-1964-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
909 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1964 OF 2026
IN APEAL/402/2026
SHAIKH ASHFAK SHAIKH SALIM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
.…
Ms Harsha R. Lomte, Advocate (Appointed through Legal Aid) for
Applicant
Mr. V. V. Jahagirdar, APP for Respondent No.1 – State
Mr. Aniruddha S. Usmanpurkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2
and 3
.…
CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.
DATE : 11 September, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Heard. This is an application for suspension of
sentence and grant of bail in consequence to the judgment and
order of conviction recorded by learned District Judge-3 and
Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, District Jalna, in Special Case
(Child) No.22 of 2017 dated 07.05.2025.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the
applicant was tried vide above special case and came to be
convicted by above judgment and order for the offence under
1 of 4
(( 2 )) 909-Cri-Apln-1964-2026
Section 354(D) of I.P.C. Sentence awarded is maximum six months
and to pay fine. Fine amount is said to be paid. According to him,
applicant was on bail during trial. As the appeal is of 2026, much
more time is required to hear the appeal, relief of suspension of
sentence and grant of bail is urged for.
3. Learned APP and learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2
and 3 strongly opposed on the ground that on full fledged trial
conviction has been recorded. Learned counsel for victim pointed
that, both victim and applicant are of same vicinity and there is
serious apprehension of misuse of liberty.
4. Learned counsel for applicant submits that, the applicant
is currently residing at Hyderabad and therefore, there is no
possibility of he coming to the village.
5. After considering the above submissions, taking into
account sentence of six months and that appeal is of 2026, may not
be heard in near future, relief as prayed deserves to be granted.
Hence, the following order:-
2 of 4
(( 3 )) 909-Cri-Apln-1964-2026
ORDER
(i) Criminal Application stands allowed.
(ii) The substantive sentence imposed on the applicant Shaikh
Ashfak Shaikh Salim, by the learned District Judge-3 and
Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, District Jalna, in Special
Case (Child) No.22 of 2017, dated 07.05.2025, stands
suspended till final hearing and disposal of Criminal Appeal
No.402 of 2026.
(iii) The applicant be released on P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees
Fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties in the like
amount.
(iv) The applicant shall not commit any criminal activity.
(v) The applicant to note that he shall not misuse the liberty in
any manner.
(vi) The applicant shall remain present before the learned trial
Judge once in six months, till final hearing and disposal of the
appeal, commencing from the date he tenders bail papers and
thereafter, the trial Judge to fix dates for his subsequent
appearances.
(vii) In case of two consecutive defaults on the part of the
applicant to remain present before the trial Court, the trial
Court to inform this Court about the same and in that
3 of 4
(( 4 )) 909-Cri-Apln-1964-2026
eventuality, the prosecution would be at liberty to file an
application for cancellation of the bail granted to the
applicant.
(viii) Bail before the trial Court.
[ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]
SMS
4 of 4
Checking your session…