Bombay High Court
SUBHASH SANTOSH WAGHMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The court held that the sentence should be suspended and bail granted pending the final disposal of the appeal.
Summary
The applicant, Subhash Santosh Waghmare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Beed, in Sessions Case No.100 of 2023 for an offence under Section 452 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to two years' imprisonment and a fine, which he had already paid. While on bail during trial, he filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and release on bail pending the hearing of his appeal (Criminal Appeal No.630 of 2026). The State and the second respondent opposed, arguing that a conviction had already been recorded. The High Court, noting the two‑year sentence and the likely delay in hearing the appeal, allowed the application, suspending the sentence until the appeal is finally decided and granting bail on a personal bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of appearance and non‑commission of further offences. The order also directed payment of the appointed counsel’s fees by the Legal Services Sub‑Committee.
Issues considered
- Whether a sentence can be suspended and bail granted to a convicted person pending the final hearing of an appeal.
- Whether the conditions imposed on bail are appropriate in the circumstances.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 452
Subjects
- bail
- suspension of sentence
- appeal pending
- IPC 452
- criminal application
- high court
- conviction
- surety
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39977
906-Cri-Apln-2052-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
906 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2052 OF 2026
IN APEAL/630/2026
SUBHASH SANTOSH WAGHMARE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
.…
Mr. Arun G. Dalal, Advocate (Through Legal Aid) for Applicant
Ms A. S. Mantri, APP for Respondent No.1 – State
Mr. Aditya Waghmare, Advocate (Appointed) for Respondent No.2
.…
CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.
DATE : 02 September, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. This is an application for suspension of sentence and
grant of bail in consequence to the judgment and order of
conviction recorded by learned Sessions Judge, Beed, in Sessions
Case No.100 of 2023, dated 22.12.2025.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the
applicant was tried vide above sessions case and came to be
convicted by above judgment and order for the offence under
Section 452 of I.P.C. Sentence awarded is maximum two years
1 of 3
(( 2 )) 906-Cri-Apln-2052-2026
imprisonment and to pay fine. Fine amount is paid. Applicant was
on bail during trial. As appeal is of 2026, much more time will is
required to hear the appeal, relief of suspension of sentence and grant
of bail is urged for.
3. Learned APP and the learned counsel for respondent No.2
opposed on the ground that on full fledged trial, conviction has been
recorded.
4. After considering the above submissions, taking into
account the sentence of two years and that appeal being 2026, may
not be heard in near future, relief as prayed deserves to be granted.
Hence, following order:-
ORDER
(i) Criminal Application stands allowed.
(ii) The substantive sentence imposed on the applicant Subhash
Santosh Waghmare by the learned Sessions Judge, Beed, in
Sessions Case No.100 of 2023 dated 22.12.2025 stands
suspended till final hearing and disposal of Criminal Appeal
No.630 of 2026.
(iii) The applicant be released on P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/-
(Rupees Fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties in
the like amount.
2 of 3
(( 3 )) 906-Cri-Apln-2052-2026
(iv) The applicant shall not commit any criminal activity.
(v) The applicant shall remain present before the learned trial
Judge once in six months, till final hearing and disposal of
the appeal, commencing from the date he tenders bail
papers and thereafter, the trial Judge to fix dates for his
subsequent appearances.
(vi) In case of two consecutive defaults on the part of the
applicant to remain present before the trial Court, the trial
Court to inform this Court about the same and in that
eventuality, the prosecution would be at liberty to file an
application for cancellation of the bail granted to the
applicant.
(vii) Bail before the trial Court.
(viii) The fees of the appointed counsel Mr. Aditya Waghmare,
shall be quantified as per rules and be paid by the High
Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad.
[ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]
SMS
3 of 3
Checking your session…