Bombay High Court

ARVIND WAMAN DHUPKARversusINDUMATI ARVIND DHUPKAR AND ORS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The applications are infructuous and are disposed of.

Summary

The petitioners, Arvind Waman Dhupkar and others, filed criminal applications (Nos. 2569 and 2568 of 2009) before the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, seeking relief against an order arising from earlier proceedings. The learned advocate for the applicants argued that the original proceedings had already been decided, rendering the present applications moot. The Court examined the submissions and found that, with the finality of the earlier case, nothing remained to be adjudicated in the pending applications. Consequently, the Court held that the applications were infructuous. The applications were therefore disposed of without any further order.

Issues considered

Whether the criminal applications are infructuous in view of the final decision in the original proceedings

Subjects

infructuous
criminal application
procedural disposal
High Court of Bombay
Aurangabad bench

Judgment

                                                             1                  936APPLN2569.2009.odt

                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                           936 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2569 OF 2009
                                                         IN WP/77/2008

                                                      Arvind Waman Dhupkar
                                                              VERSUS
                                                 Indumati Arvind Dhupkar And Ors
                                                                  ...
                             Mr. Shrikrishna U. Chaudhari - Advocate for Applicant through VC
                             Mr. V. K. Kotecha - APP for the State
                                                                  ...

                                                            WITH
                                      CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2568 OF 2009 IN WP/77/2008
                                                              …

                                                       CORAM :    HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
                                                       DATED :    10TH SEPTEMBER, 2026

                             PER COURT :

                             1.            The learned Advocate appearing for the Applicants submits

                             that the original proceedings, from which the impugned order arose in

                             the present Applications, have already been decided. He submits that the

                             present Criminal Applications have, therefore, become infructuous.



                             2.            Taking into consideration the submissions made by the

                             learned Advocate for the Applicants, nothing survives in the

                             Applications. The Applications accordingly stand disposed of.




                                                                    [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ]
                                                                             JUDGE

                             SG Punde

Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 11/09/2026 15:55:01

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…