Bombay High Court
PRADNYASHIL MAROTI PAIKRAO AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear.
Summary
The petitioners filed Criminal Application No. 258 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No petitioner or their counsel appeared on the last date of hearing, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the application. The Court observed this non‑appearance as a clear indication of want of prosecution. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when the petitioner fails to appear for a hearing, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the application?
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- non‑appearance
- want of prosecution
- application dismissal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41772-DB
911-APPLN-258-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
911 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 258 OF 2021
Pradnyashil Maroti Paikrao And Others
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for Respondent No.1/State
CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE :SEPTEMBER 10, 2026
P. C. :
1. None for the Applicants. Even on the last date of hearing, none
appears. This shows that Applicants or his Counsel has no interest in
prosecuting the Application. Hence, Application stands dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Malani
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…