Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GORAKH BHAURAO SURYAWANSHI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Since the applicants have been acquitted, the pending criminal application is infructuous and is dismissed.

Summary

In Criminal Application No. 2591 of 2022, the applicants sought relief against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants' counsel submitted that the applicants had been acquitted by an order dated 23 June 2026 in RCC No. 287/2022. The court took note of the acquittal order and marked it for identification. Since the acquittal left no surviving issue, the court held that the pending application was moot. Consequently, the application was dismissed as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal application is maintainable after the applicants have been acquitted in the substantive criminal case?

Subjects

  • acquittal
  • criminal application
  • infructuous
  • mootness
  • dismissal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39963-DB




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2591 OF 2022

                          GORAKH BHAURAO SURYAWANSHI AND OTHERS
                                           VERSUS
                           THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                                             ...

           Mr. R. S. Salve h/f Mr. H. V. Tungar, Advocate for the applicants
           Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for the Respondent/State


                                                      CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
                                                      DATED     : 2nd SEPTEMBER, 2026

           PER COURT :-

           1.    Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.

           2.    Learned Advocate for the applicants submits that, by order dated

           23.06.2026 passed in R.C.C. No. 287/2022, the applicants have been

           acquitted. In view thereof, nothing survives for consideration in the present

           application. The copy of the said order is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for

           the purpose of identification.

           3.    In view of the above, the application stands dismissed as having become

           infructuous.


                                                                 ( R. M. JOSHI, J.)
           ssp




           criapln2591.22.odt                                                         1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.