Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VIDYA BRIJBHUSHAN GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
APPLICATION ALLOWED

Holding

The court held that an amicable settlement with a clear undertaking to withdraw the pending criminal proceeding warrants quashing the FIR, charge sheet, and RCC proceedings.

Summary

The applicant sought quashing of an FIR (Crime No. 0162 of 2018) and a subsequent charge sheet and RCC proceeding (No. 1722 of 2024) relating to offences under Section 66(C) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 201 of the IPC. The parties had earlier resolved their dispute through mediation, resulting in a written compromise deed wherein the husband undertook to withdraw the criminal proceeding within a month. Both parties, through their advocates, consented to the settlement and requested the court to set aside the criminal proceedings. The court examined the mediation report and the compromise deed, noting the specific undertaking to withdraw the case, and concluded that the settlement justified quashing the FIR and related proceedings. Accordingly, the application was allowed and the FIR, charge sheet, and RCC proceeding were quashed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal proceeding under the Information Technology Act can be quashed on the basis of an amicable settlement and a specific undertaking to withdraw the case.
  • Whether the court has jurisdiction to set aside an FIR and charge sheet after parties have reached a compromise.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • mediation
  • settlement
  • quash FIR
  • Information Technology Act
  • cybercrime
  • compromise deed
  • withdrawal of criminal proceedings
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38729
                                                                     997appln2671-26

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                       997 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2671 OF 2026

                                   Vidya Brijbhushan Gaikwad
                                             VERSUS
                              The State Of Maharashtra And Another
                                                ...
            Mr. Patil Nileshsingh J, Advocate for the Applicant
            Mr. S. A. Gaikwad, APP for the Respondent-State
            Mr. Tukaram M. Venjane, Advocate for Respondent No.2


                                   CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
                                     Dated : 27th August, 2026
            PER COURT :-

            1.       The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the

            present application is filed for quashing of the First Information Report

            bearing Crime No. 0162 of 2018 registered with Vivekanand Chowk

            Police Station, Latur for the offences punishable under sections 66(C)

            of the Information Technology Act, 2000, dated 20.05.2018, and also

            for quashing of the consequent charge sheet and RCC proceedings

            bearing No. 1722 of 2024 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., Latur,

            along-with all the other consequential orders passed therein.


            2.       The learned Advocate for the applicant further submits that

            the parties have amicably settled the dispute among themselves during

            the process of mediation when they were referred to the mediator by

            order dated 16.01.2026 passed by this Court in Misc. Civil Application

            No. 10 of 2023. He categorically refers to the mediation report filed in



                                                                                1 of 4
                                                          997appln2671-26

the proceedings of Misc. Civil Application No. 10 of 2023, wherein it is

specified that the mediation is successful and the terms of settlement

are enclosed therewith. The said mediation report is dated 20.02.2026

and the terms of settlement are dated 12.02.2026, which is signed by

the parties as well as the Advocates for the parties appearing in the

Misc. Civil Application No.10 of 2023. The learned Advocate for the

applicant further refers to paragraph no. 5 of the said consent terms

which reads as under:-


        “05. That, the wife undertakes to withdraw the cases
        If any, within the period of one month from today. The
        husband undertakes that, he will withdraw the
        proceeding bearing R.C.C. No. 1722/2024 pending
        before the Ld. Judicial Magistrate First Class, Latur for
        the offences punishable U/s. 201 of Indian Penal Code
        and U/s. 66-C of Information Technology Act within a
        period of one month from today. Both the wife and
        husband agree that in future both of them will not file
        any proceeding or complaint against each other or
        against the family members in future in connection
        with the present dispute.”


3.       Accordingly, the learned Advocate for the applicant submits

that on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties, the

proceeding bearing RCC No. 1722 of 2024 has been agreed to be

withdrawn by the husband. It is thus submitted that on the basis of the

said mediation report and the settlement between the parties, with

                                                                    2 of 4
                                                           997appln2671-26

specific undertaking given by the husband in the said settlement, the

present proceedings be quashed and set aside in terms of the

settlement, specially, para 5 of the said compromise deed.


4.         The learned Advocate for respondent no.2 do not dispute the

above stated fact and also submits that the parties have amicably

settled the dispute and the settlement has been drawn in to a written

compromise deed, which was placed before this Court in Misc. Civil

Application No. 10 of 2023 and by considering the same, on

06.03.2026, this court had has allowed the said application. He further

states that he has instructions to give no objections in order to allow

the present application and quash the entire proceeding as prayed

therein.


5.         The mediation report, order dated 06.03.2026 of this Court in

MCA No. 10/2023 and the compromise pursis filed on behalf of wife

and husband filed in MCA No. 10 of 2023 dated 12.202.2026 are taken

on record and marked as ‘X’ collectively for the purpose of

identification.


6.         Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. I have perused

the mediation report as well as the terms of          compromise dated

12.02.2026.


7.         Taking into consideration the fact that amicable settlement has


                                                                     3 of 4
                                                                    997appln2671-26

           arrived at between the parties and a specific undertaking is provided in

           the compromise deed that the proceedings pending before the learned

           JMFC, Latur between the parties, bearing RCC No. 1722 of 2024 will

           be withdrawn, this Court has no hesitation in allowing the present

           application. Hence, the following order:



                                          ORDER


           (a)   Criminal Application No. 2671 of 2026 stands allowed.


           (b)    First Information Report bearing Crime No. 0162 of 2018

                 registered with Vivekanand Chowk Police Station, Latur for the

                 offences punishable under sections 66(C) of the Information

                 Technology Act, 2000, dated 20.05.2018, consequent charge

                 sheet and RCC proceedings bearing No. 1722 of 2024 pending on

                 the file of learned J.M.F.C., Latur, along-with all the other

                 consequential orders passed therein are hereby quashed and set

                 aside.


           (c)   No orders as to costs.




                                                      (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.)
JPChavan




                                                                              4 of 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.