Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DNYANESHWAR ALIAS MAULI VITTHAL PANCHALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
APPLICATION ALLOWED

Holding

The sentence is suspended pending the final hearing of the appeal and bail is granted on bond.

Summary

The applicant, Dnyaneshwar, was convicted under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code for abetment of suicide and sentenced to four years' imprisonment, of which he had served more than five months. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending the hearing of his appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 535 of 2026). The State opposed, arguing that the conviction was on record. The High Court, noting that the appeal was recent and unlikely to be heard soon, admitted the appeal, waived notice, and ordered the suspension of the substantive sentence until the appeal is finally decided. The Court also granted bail on a personal bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of regular appearance before the trial court. The order emphasizes that any default may lead to cancellation of bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether the sentence imposed under Section 306 IPC should be suspended pending the final hearing of the appeal
  • Whether bail should be granted to the convicted appellant during the pendency of the appeal

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • suspension of sentence
  • appeal pending
  • Section 306 IPC
  • criminal application
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:31099


                                                                      93-CriAppln-2672-2026+



                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                            93 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2672 OF 2026
                                IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535 OF 2026
                                              WITH
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535 OF 2026


                 Dnyaneshwar @ Mauli s/o Vitthal Panchal
                 Age … Years, Occu. : Agril,
                 R/o. Wadepuri, Taluka Loha,
                 District Nanded.                        …            Applicant/
                                                                      Appellant

                       Versus

                 The State of Maharashtra,
                 Through Police Station Officer,
                 Police Station, Sonkhed,
                 District Nanded.                              … Respondent
                                                   ...
                 Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Suraj R. Bagal
                 APP for Respondent-State : Mr. D. J. Patil
                                                   ...

                                         CORAM :         ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.
                                         DATE      :     27.07.2026

                 ORDER :

                 1.    Instant application is for suspension of sentence and grant of

                 bail in consequence to the judgment and order of conviction passed

                 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kandhar, District Nanded dated

                 12.06.2026 in Sessions Case No. 34 of 2011.



                                                   [1]
                                                 93-CriAppln-2672-2026+




2.    Learned counsel pointed out that, the applicant was tried vide

above Sessions Case and he has been held guilty for offence under

Section 306 of IPC. That, sentence awarded is imprisonment for four

years. That, applicant has already undergone more than five months

imprisonment. That, appeal against the said order of conviction has

been preferred, but it being of the year 2026, there are no immediate

prospects of it being heard and decided. Learned counsel further

submitted that, applicant has a good case on merits in appeal. That,

applicant was on bail during trial and he has already paid the fine

amount.



3.    Learned APP would oppose on the ground that, on full fledge

trial, conviction has been recorded.



4.    After considering the above submissions and on going through

papers, it emerges that vide judgment and order dated 12.06.2026

passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kandhar, District

Nanded in Sessions Case No. 34 of 2011, applicant has been

convicted for offence under Section 306 of IPC, against which appeal

is preferred. Out of four years sentence, applicant is said to have



                                  [2]
                                                   93-CriAppln-2672-2026+



undergone more than five months imprisonment. Appeal being recent

one, there are no chances of hearing the appeal in immediate future.

Applicant was said to be on bail during trial. Fine amount is also paid.

Therefore relief as prayed deserves to be granted. Hence, the

following order :

                                ORDER


I.      The Criminal Appeal No. 535 of 2026 is admitted.


II.     Learned APP waives notice on admission.


III.    Call record and proceedings.


IV. Criminal Application No. 2672 of 2026 stands allowed.


V.     The substantive sentence imposed on the applicant in Sessions
       Case No. 34 of 2011 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,
       Kandhar on 12.06.2026 stands suspended till the final hearing
       and disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 535 of 2026.


VI. The applicant be released on P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees
       Fifteen Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties in the like
       amount.


VII. The applicant shall not commit any criminal activity.




                                  [3]
                                                       93-CriAppln-2672-2026+



VIII. The applicant shall remain present before the learned trial Judge
      once in six months, till final hearing and disposal of the appeal,
      commencing from the date he tenders bail papers and thereafter,
      the trial Judge to fix dates for his subsequent appearances.


IX. In case of two consecutive defaults on the part of the applicant to
      remain present before the trial court, the trial court to inform
      this court about the same and in that eventuality, the
      prosecution would be at liberty to file an application for
      cancellation of bail granted to the applicant.


X.    Bail before the trial court.




                                     [ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.]



vre




                                     [4]


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.