Bombay High Court
ARJUN SABAJI THUBEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The court allowed the application and condoned the delay.
Summary
Arjun Sabaji Thube filed a criminal application seeking time to file a vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.2. The applicant’s counsel, N.B. Narwade, argued for condonation of the delay. The court examined the reasons for the delay as set out in Criminal Application No. 2808 of 2025 and found them satisfactory. Accordingly, the application was allowed and the delay was condoned. The court also ordered that the pending criminal appeal be listed for hearing on 22 October 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay in filing the vakalatnama can be condoned under criminal procedure law
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- condonation of delay
- vakalatnama
- appeal listing
- high court order
Judgment
(1)
956 Cri.Appln-2808.2025.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
956 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2808 OF 2025
IN APEAL/124/2025
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 124 OF 2025
ARJUN SABAJI THUBE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. N.B. Narwade, Advocate for the applicant.
Mrs. Uma Bhosale, A.P.P. for respondent-State.
Mr. Nitin Salunke, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 1st October, 2026
Per Court :
1. Learned counsel Mr. Nitin Salunke causes appearance on
behalf of respondent No.2 and seeks time to file Vakalatnama.
2. For the reasons mentioned in the Criminal Application
No.2808 of 2025, the application is allowed and delay
mentioned therein stands condoned.
3. List the Criminal Appeal on 22.10.2026.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
VD_Dhirde
Checking your session…