Bombay High Court

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusVAIBHAV ALIAS SONU ARUN PAWAR AND ANOTHER

Disposal: APPLICATION ALLOWED

Holding

The Court allowed the applications and condoned the delay periods.

Summary

The State of Maharashtra filed two criminal applications seeking to condone delay in filing appeals against Bajirao alias Subhash Sajan Pawar and others, and Vaibhav alias Sonu Arun Pawar and another. The High Court, after hearing the matter, allowed both applications and expressly condoned the delay periods mentioned. The court directed that the appeals be registered once any office objections, if present, are removed. No substantive discussion on the merits of the underlying criminal matters was provided. The judgment was delivered by Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav.

Issues considered

Whether the delay in filing the criminal appeals can be condoned
Whether the appeals can be registered pending removal of any office objections

Subjects

delay condonation
criminal appeal
registration of appeal
high court

Judgment

                                     (1)
                                                 972 Cri.appln-2676.2026 + 1.odt
       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

            CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2676 OF 2026
                    IN APEALST/7126/2026

               THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                        VERSUS
     BAJIRAO ALIAS SUBHASH SAJAN PAWAR AND OTHERS

                            WITH
            CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2864 OF 2026
                     IN ALSST/7583/2026

               THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                         VERSUS
       VAIBHAV ALIAS SONU ARUN PAWAR AND ANOTHER

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for applicant-State.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                            VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                    DATED       : 1st October, 2026

Per Court :

1.     Heard.

2.     For    the   reasons     stated      in    the    applications,     the
applications stand allowed and the respective delay period
mentioned therein stands condoned.

3.     Appeals be registered after removal of office objections, if
any.


(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)                    (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
       JUDGE                                       JUDGE


VD_Dhirde

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…