Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VISHWANATH KASHINATH SAVLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The Court quantified the fees of the appointed counsel, Ms Deepali Patil, at Rs 7,000.

Summary

The Court entertained an application to speak to the minutes of its order dated 8 January 2026, wherein the appointed counsel for Respondent No. 2, Ms Deepali Patil, sought a higher fee than the standard amount prescribed by the rules. Ms Patil argued that the existing fee was meagre. The Court accepted her request, deleted paragraph 4 of the earlier order and substituted a new clause fixing her fees at Rs 7,000. The amendment was ordered to be uploaded. Consequently, the appointed counsel’s remuneration was increased as directed by the Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the fee payable to an appointed counsel in a criminal appeal can be increased beyond the standard rate prescribed by the rules

Subjects

  • appointed counsel
  • court fees
  • legal aid
  • speaking to minutes
  • criminal appeal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:501
                   This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //


                                                              1                         Appln.3061.2025.odt


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                                 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3061 OF 2025
                                  IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 596 OF 2025

                              VISHWANATH KASHINATH SAVLE
                                          VERSUS
                       THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                                             …
                          APP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. V.K. Kotecha
                       Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Ms. Deepali Patil
                                             …
                                               CORAM : RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.
                                               DATE : 14TH JANUARY, 2026
              PER COURT :

              1.                This motion is moved for speaking to the minutes of the

              order dated 08.01.2026.

              2.                Learned counsel Ms. Deepali Patil, who was appointed for

              respondent no. 2, requests a reasonable amount, as the current payment

              for an appointed advocate is meager as per the rules.

              3.                Her request is accepted. Paragraph no. 4 of the order dated

              08.01.2026 be deleted and the following sentence be substituted :

                                “Ms. Deepali Patil, learned counsel for respondent no. 2, is

                                present. Since she was appointed by the Court, her fees are

                                quantified at Rs. 7,000/- (Rupees seven thousand).”

              4.                Necessary order be uploaded.




                                                                               ( RAJNISH R. VYAS, J. )
              SPC


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.