Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AAYAN WAYID KHATIKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
APPLICATION ALLOWED

Holding

The criminal application is allowed; the sentence is suspended and bail is granted pending the final hearing of the appeal.

Summary

The applicant, Aayan Wayid Khatik, was convicted under Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and sentenced to six months' imprisonment with a fine, which has been paid. He was on bail during the trial and has filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and release on bail pending the hearing of his appeal. The State opposed, arguing that a conviction had been recorded. The Court considered the short term of imprisonment and the likely delay in hearing the appeal, and deemed that the applicant should be allowed liberty pending the final disposal. Consequently, the Court ordered the suspension of the sentence, granted bail on a personal bond with sureties, and imposed conditions for periodic appearance before the trial court. The order also provided for cancellation of bail upon repeated defaults.

Issues considered

  • Whether the sentence imposed under Section 12 of the POCSO Act should be suspended pending the final hearing of the appeal
  • Whether bail should be granted to the convicted applicant during the pendency of the appeal

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • POCSO
  • suspension of sentence
  • bail
  • criminal appeal
  • child sexual offence
  • sentence suspension

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:32584


                                                             P-2(a)-Cri-Apln-3109-2026.odt




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3109 OF 2026
                                            IN
                              CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 618 OF 2026

                                      AAYAN WAYID KHATIK
                                              VERSUS
                           THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                                                .…
                 Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar, Advocate for Applicant
                 Mr. S. D. Ghayal, APP for Respondent - State
                                                .…

                                   CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

                                      DATE : July 31, 2026
                 PER COURT :-


                 1.         Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.


                 2.         This is an application for suspension of sentence and

                 grant of bail in consequent to the judgment and order of

                 conviction recorded by learned Designated Judge under Protection

                 of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 at Jalgaon District

                 Jalgaon in Special Case No.160 of 2020 dated 14.07.2026.


                 3.         Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the

                 applicant was tried vide above sessions case and came to be

                                                                                   1 of 3
                                   (( 2 ))      P-2(a)-Cri-Apln-3109-2026




convicted by above judgment and order for the offence under Section

12 of POCSO Act. Sentence awarded is maximum six months and pay

fine. Fine amount is paid. According to him, applicant was on bail

during trial. As appeal is of 2026, as much more time is required to

hear the appeal, relief of suspension of sentence and grant of bail is

urged for.


4.           Learned APP opposed on the ground that on full fledged

trial conviction has been recorded.


5.           After considering the above submissions, taking into

account sentence of six months and that appeal being 2026, may not

be heard in near future, relief as prayed deserves to be granted.

Hence, the following order:-

                               ORDER

     (i)     Criminal Application stands allowed.

     (ii)    The substantive sentence imposed on the applicant Aayan
             Wayid Khatik by the learned Designated Judge under
             Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 at
             Jalgaon, District Jalgaon in Special Case No. 160 of 2020
             dated 14.07.2026 stands suspended till final hearing and
             disposal of Criminal Appeal No.618 of 2026.



                                                                            2 of 3
                                     (( 3 ))       P-2(a)-Cri-Apln-3109-2026




      (iii)   The applicant be released on P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/-
              (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties in
              the like amount.

      (iv)    The applicant shall not commit any criminal activity.

      (v)     The applicant shall remain present before the learned trial
              Judge once in six months, till final hearing and disposal of
              the appeal, commencing from the date he tenders bail
              papers and thereafter, the trial Judge to fix dates for his
              subsequent appearances.

      (vi)    In case of two consecutive defaults on the part of the
              applicant to remain present before the trial Court, the trial
              Court to inform this Court about the same and in that
              eventuality, the prosecution would be at liberty to file an
              application for cancellation of the bail granted to the
              applicant.

       (vii) Bail before the trial Court.



                                        [ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]

SMS




                                                                               3 of 3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.