Bombay High Court

BHAGWAT BALIRAM MUNDHEversusSANJAY JANARDHAN GITTE AND ANOTHER

Disposal: APPLICATION ALLOWED

Holding

Bail was granted to the applicant as per the prayer clause (B) of the applications.

Summary

The applicant, Bhagwat Baliram Mundhe, filed multiple bail applications (Nos. 3295, 3297, 3298, 3299 of 2026) before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The applications sought the release of the applicant on bail pending trial. The Court, after considering the prayers made in clause (B) of the applications, granted bail to the applicant. All the criminal applications were consequently disposed of. No substantive discussion of facts or legal arguments was recorded in the excerpt.

Issues considered

Whether bail should be granted to the applicant in the pending criminal proceedings

Subjects

bail
criminal procedure
High Court of Bombay
Aurangabad Bench
application disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:46088
                                                                            1000-APPLN-3298-26.odt



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3298 OF 2026
                            IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1345 OF 2026

         Bhagwat Baliram Mundhe                                   ..APPLICANT
               VERSUS
         Shaikh Ajimoddin Jilani @ Munna Shaikh
         and Others                                               ..RESPONDENTS

                        WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3295 OF 2026
                           IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1408 OF 2026
                        WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3297 OF 2026
                           IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1400 OF 2026
                        WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3299 OF 2026
                           IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1473 OF 2026
                                               ....
         Mr. U.M. Maske Patil, Advocate for applicant
         Mr. S.J. Salunke, Advocate for Respondent No1. In APPLN/3298/2026
         Mr. S.B. Solanke, Advocate for Respondent No.1 in APPLN/3295/2026 and
         APPLN/3297/2026
         Mr. V.H. Solanke, Advocate h/f Mr. R.T. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent
         No.1 in APPLN/3299/2026
         Mr. K.K. Naik, A.P.P. for Respondent nos.2 and 3
                                               ....

                                           CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
                                           DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2026

         PER COURT :

         1.          For the reasons recorded in these applications for assist to P.P., same

         are allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).


         2.          Criminal applications stand disposed of accordingly.




                                                      ( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. )
         SSD



                                             1 / 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…