Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KISHOR JAGANNATH GANGAWANEversusVANDANA KISHOR GANGWANE AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The application for condonation of delay was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed Criminal Application No. 3340/2022 seeking condonation of delay. The Court observed that no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It warned that if no representation is made on the next date, the application would be dismissed. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. As the condonation application was dismissed, the associated Revision Application No. 9248/2022 was also disposed, and the Criminal Revision Application stands disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a condonation of delay application can proceed in the absence of any representation by the applicant.

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • criminal procedure
  • want of prosecution
  • revision application
  • dismissal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38426




                                                 -1-

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            915 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3340 OF 2022
                                      IN REVNST/9248/2022

                                 KISHOR JAGANNATH GANGAWANE
                                            VERSUS
                             VANDANA KISHOR GANGWANE AND OTHERS

                                  ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )

                                      DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2026

              PER COURT :


              1.             Vide order dated 14.08.2026, it has been observed by this

              Court that no one is appearing for the Applicant, and if on the next date

              none appears for the Applicant, this application shall stand dismissed.

              As such, Criminal Application No.3340/2022 stands dismissed for want

              of prosecution.

              2.             As the Application for condonation of delay stands

              dismissed, nothing survives in the Revision Application Stamp

              No.9248/2022. Hence, Cri.R.A. also stands disposed of.




                                                     ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)




              khs/Aug.2026/3340


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.