Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DNYANESHWAR JAGGNATH PEDDEversusVAISHNAVI W/O. DNYANESHWAR PEDDE AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The application is dismissed as infructuous because the dispute has been amicably settled and no issue remains.

Summary

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Jaggnath Pedde, filed Criminal Application No. 3412 of 2022 seeking relief against Vaishnavi, his wife, and another respondent. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. H. H. Padalkar and Mr. Katneshwarkar, informed the court that the dispute between the parties had been amicably settled. On the basis of this settlement, the court examined whether any issue remained for adjudication. Finding that the settlement extinguished the cause of action, the court held that there was nothing left to be decided. Consequently, the application was disposed of as infructuous on 29 August 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal application should be dismissed as infructuous due to an amicable settlement between the parties

Subjects

  • settlement
  • infructuous
  • criminal application
  • dismissal
  • amicable settlement

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39468


                                               1/1                  915-APPLN-3412-2022


                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              915 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3412 OF 2022
                                         IN REVNST-9455-2022

                                Dnyaneshwar Jaggnath Pedde
                                          VERSUS
                       Vaishnavi W-o. Dnyaneshwar Pedde And Another
                                             …..
                Mr. H. H. Padalkar h/f., Mr. Katneshwarkar S.P., Advocate for
                Applicant.
                                             …..

                                            CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
                                            DATE : 29 AUGUST, 2026

                PER COURT :

                1.        Mr. H. H. Padalkar, holding for Mr. Katneshwarkar, learned
                counsel for the applicant, states that the dispute between the
                parties has been amicably settled. As such, nothing survives in the
                matter. Hence, the matter is disposed of as infructuous.



                                                 (SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)




                Kiran Kawre


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.