Bombay High Court
SUNIL VITTALRAO BIRAJDARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- ABHAY S WAGHWASE
Holding
Bail was granted and the sentence was suspended pending the final hearing and disposal of the criminal revision.
Summary
The applicant, Sunil Vittalrao Birajdar, was convicted by a Judicial Magistrate First Class in 2015 for offences under IPC Sections 279, 304-A and 337, and the conviction was upheld by an Additional Sessions Judge in 2026. He filed a criminal revision challenging the conviction and, during the pendency of that revision, applied for bail and suspension of the sentence, arguing that the revision would require considerable time and that he had a strong meritorious case. The State opposed bail on the ground of the seriousness of the offences and multiple deaths caused. The court noted that the maximum sentence imposed was only three months, no adverse remarks were recorded, and the fine had been paid. Considering the nature of the offences, the pending revision, and the relatively minor sentence, the court granted bail, suspended the sentence pending final disposal of the revision, and ordered the applicant to be released on a bond of Rs.15,000 with a surety.
Issues considered
- Whether bail can be granted to a convicted person pending the final hearing of a criminal revision for offences under Sections 279, 304-A and 337 IPC.
- Whether the sentence imposed in the summary criminal case should be suspended pending disposal of the revision.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 279, 304-A, 337
Subjects
- bail
- suspension of sentence
- criminal revision
- IPC 279
- IPC 304-A
- IPC 337
- summary criminal case
- conviction
- appeal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:2915
919-APPLN-348-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 348 OF 2026
IN REVN/34/2026
Sunil Vittalrao Birajdar
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra
...
Mr. A. D. Kulkarni, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. S. G. Sangle, APP for Respondents
***
CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J
DATE : JANUARY 23, 2026
PC :
1. Present application is for suspension of sentence and grant
of bail as a result of conviction recorded by learned Judicial Magistrate
First Class, Omerga, Dist. Dharashiv in Summary Criminal Case No.
56/2008 vide judgment and order dated 06.02.2015 and further
confirmed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga, Dist.
Dharashiv in Criminal Appeal No.05.2015 vide judgment and order
dated 21.01.2026.
2. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that, present
Applicant has been tried for offences under Sections 279, 304-A, 337 of
the Indian Penal Code. That, learned Judicial Magistrate First Class,
Omerga was pleased to convict the Applicant for above offence. The said
judgment was challenged before learned Additional Sessions Judge,
PAGE 1 OF 3
919-APPLN-348-2026.odt
Omerga by filing Criminal Appeal No. 05/2015, however, even learned
First Appellate Court was pleased to confirm the conviction and reject
the appeal, against which, present Revision has been filed. He submits
that Applicant has been taken into custody by virtue of above orders.
That, in Trial Court as well as before Appellate Court Applicant was on
bail. That, during the pendency of the Revision, present Application for
bail is pressed into service. That, Applicant has good case on merit in
Revision and has every hope in succeeding the case. According to him,
there are several infirmities in the impugned judgment and order.
However, as much more time would be required to hear Revision, he
urges to grant of bail.
3. Learned APP for Respondent/State strongly opposes the
Application on the ground that, serious offences has been committed by
Applicant and there are several deaths in the accident and he submits
that, Revision can be taken up earlier, if so desire.
4. After considering the above submissions and on going
through the papers, it appears that, learned JMFC has awarded the
conviction, which was confirmed by the learned Appellate Court. It
seems that, maximum sentence awarded to the Applicant is of 3
months. There is no adverse remark found and fine amount is said to be
paid.
PAGE 2 OF 3
919-APPLN-348-2026.odt
5. In the light of above and considering the nature of
proceedings and as Revision is yet to be heard, relief of bail deserves to
be granted.
6. In view of above, following order:
ORDER
(a) Criminal Application stands allowed.
(b) Substantive sentence imposed on applicant by learned
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Omerga, Dist.
Dharashiv in Summary Criminal Case No. 56/2008 vide
judgment and order dated 06.02.2015 and further
confirmed by learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Omerga, Dist. Dharashiv in Criminal Appeal No.05/2015
vide judgment and order dated 21.01.2026, stands
suspended till the final hearing and disposal of present
Criminal Revision Application.
(c) The applicant be released on bail on P.R. Bond of Rs.
15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with one solvent
surety in the like amount.
(d) The applicant shall not commit any criminal activity.
(e) Bail before trial Court.
(ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.)
Umesh
PAGE 3 OF 3
Checking your session…