Bombay High Court
VISHAL PRABHAKARAO DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The Court held that the criminal writ petition should be restored to its original stage for adjudication on its merits.
Summary
Vishal Prabhakaro Deshmukh filed a criminal writ petition (No. 752 of 2026) alleging that Respondent No. 11 fraudulently sold land that had been acquired by the Government, misrepresenting its boundaries. The High Court had earlier dismissed the petition on the ground that the dispute was civil in nature. The petitioner sought restoration of the writ petition, contending that the fraud allegations warranted criminal proceedings. The Court examined the allegations of fraud and the character of the dispute and concluded that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to contest the criminal writ on its merits. Accordingly, the application for restoration was allowed, the writ petition was restored to its original stage, and a date was fixed for listing.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal writ petition dismissed on the ground that the dispute is civil in nature can be restored.
- Whether the alleged fraud in the sale of government‑acquired land justifies proceeding with a criminal writ petition.
Subjects
- land dispute
- government acquisition
- fraud
- criminal writ petition
- restoration of petition
- civil vs criminal jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41731-DB
929 appln 3515-26 .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
929 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3515 OF 2026
IN WP/752/2026
VISHAL PRABHAKARAO DESHMUKH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Bhokrikar Mahadeo M., Advocate for Applicant
Mr. A. S. Shinde, APP for Respondent-State
….
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
Date : 09/09/2026
PER COURT :
1. Heard.
2. Though learned APP strongly opposed the application whereby the
applicant seeks restoration of his writ petition, which came to be
dismissed by this Court on 21/07/2026, but admittedly, the aforesaid
writ petition was dismissed by this Court on the ground that the
dispute involved therein was of a civil nature. However, learned counsel
for the petitioner submits that respondent No. 11 had sold the land
despite the same having been acquired by the Government. He further
submits that respondent No. 11, by allegedly playing fraud, has shown
the boundaries of the petitioner's land in the sale deed executed by
him.
VS Maind/ Page|1
929 appln 3515-26 .
4. Considering the allegations made against respondent No. 11 and
the nature of the dispute, we deem it appropriate to grant one
opportunity to the petitioner to contest Criminal Writ Petition No. 752
of 2026 on its own merits. Accordingly, the application stands allowed
in terms of prayer clause ‘B’.
5. Criminal Writ Petition No. 752 of 2026 stands restored to its
original stage.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to place on record a
map of the disputed land showing all its boundaries.
7. List Criminal Writ Petition No. 752 of 2026 on 23/09/2026.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
VS Maind/ Page|2
Checking your session…