Bombay High Court
RAVIKUMAR VASUDEV RAJPALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Deepak Ramesh Chetwani, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1425 of 2026) along with a criminal application (No. 3596 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The State of Maharashtra opposed the relief, and both parties were represented by counsel. After hearing, the Court expressed a disinclination to grant anticipatory bail. On the instructions of the petitioner’s counsel, the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court allowed the withdrawal, dismissing the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn and disposing of any pending applications. No substantive merits on bail were adjudicated.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- criminal procedure
- withdrawal of application
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:44194
1 27.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
27 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1425 OF 2026
DEEPAK RAMESH CHETWANI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
...
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3596 OF 2026
IN ABA/1425/2026
...
Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Jadhav Satej S
Advocate for Applicant in Cri.Appl.3596 of 2026 : Mr. Patil Vijay Bhalerao
APP for Respondent/State : Ms.P.J. Bharad
…
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 28.09.2026
PER COURT :
. After hearing learned counsel for both the sides, when this Court
has shown disinclination to grant relief to the applicant, the learned
counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw
the application.
2. Hence, the Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
3. Pending Application (s) also stand disposed of.
( R. M. JOSHI, J. )
V.S.Joshi
Checking your session…