Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RUPSING SUBHASH RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
APPLICATION ALLOWED

Holding

The court held that the sentence should be suspended pending the final hearing of the appeal and bail granted to the applicant.

Summary

Rupsing Subhash Rathod was convicted by the Special Sessions Judge, Latur, under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for possession of 6 kg of ganja, receiving a two‑year imprisonment. He was the pillion rider on a motorcycle from which the narcotics were recovered; the rider, accused No.2, is absconding. Rathod filed an appeal (Criminal Appeal No.722 of 2026) but the appeal is unlikely to be heard soon. He applied for suspension of his sentence and bail pending the appeal. The High Court, noting the delay in hearing the appeal and his role as a pillion rider, allowed the application, suspending the sentence until the appeal is disposed and granting bail on a personal bond with sureties and conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether a sentence can be suspended and bail granted pending the final hearing of an appeal against a conviction under the NDPS Act.
  • Whether the applicant's status as a pillion rider and the absconding status of the co‑accused justify granting bail.
  • What conditions may be imposed on bail in such circumstances.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • NDPS Act
  • bail
  • suspension of sentence
  • criminal appeal
  • pillion rider
  • absconding accused
  • personal bond

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39947


                                                                   Cri-Apln-3597-2026.odt




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                          904 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3597 OF 2026
                                         IN APEAL/722/2026
                                   RUPSING SUBHASH RATHOD
                                              VERSUS
                                  THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                                .…
                 Mr. Mukund D. Gitte, Advocate for Applicant
                 Mr. N. D. Raje, APP for Respondent – State
                                                .…

                                    CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

                           RESERVED ON : 01 September, 2026
                        PRONOUNCED ON : 02 September, 2026
                 O R D E R :-

                 1.          This is an application for suspension of sentence and

                 grant of bail in consequence to the judgment and order of

                 conviction passed by learned Sessions Judge, Latur, District Latur

                 in Special (NDSP) Case No.04 of 2016, dated 19.08.2026,

                 recording conviction for the offence under Sections 20(b) (ii) (B)

                 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (N.D.P. S.) Act.

                 2.          Learned counsel for applicant pointed out that the

                 applicant was tried vide above sessions case and he came to be

                 convicted for the offence under Sections 20(b) (ii) (B) of the

                 N.D.P. S. Act. Sentence awarded is of two years imprisonment.

                                                                                   1 of 3
                                  (( 2 ))           Cri-Apln-3597-2026




That, moreover, applicant was pillion rider. Recovery is said to be

from accused No.2, who was riding the motorcycle. He is said to be

absconding. The applicant has preferred appeal against the judgment

and order of conviction. However, it being of 2026, may not be heard

earlier. Consequently, relief of suspension of sentence and grant of

bail is urged for.

3.           Learned APP opposed on the ground that, on full fledged

trial, conviction has been recorded and moreover, there is recovery of

6 kg ganja from the accused persons.

4.           Considering the above submission and on going through

the record, it appears that the applicant and one absconding accused,

both were tried by learned Special Judge, Latur, vide Special (NDPS)

Case No.04 of 2016. Statement made across the bar that, applicant

was pillion rider. Moreover, he is shown as accused No.1. It is pointed

out that, accused No.2 who was riding the motorcycle, is absconding

and recovery of red bag is from the tank of the motorcycle i.e. the one

driven by absconding accused. Sentence is of two years. Appeal is of

2026. Therefore, there are no chances of hearing the appeal in near

future. Hence, relief as prayed, deserves to be granted. Accordingly,

following order is passed:-

                                                                         2 of 3
                                      (( 3 ))           Cri-Apln-3597-2026




                                  ORDER

      (i)     Criminal Application stands allowed.

      (ii)    The substantive sentence imposed on the applicant Rupsing
              Subhash Rathod, by the learned Sessions Judge, Latur,
              District Latur, in Special (NDPS) Case No.04 of 2016, dated
              19.08.2026, stands suspended till final hearing and disposal
              of Criminal Appeal No.722 of 2026.

      (iii)   The applicant be released on P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/-
              (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties in
              the like amount.

      (iv)    The applicant shall not commit any criminal activity.

      (v)     The applicant shall remain present before the learned trial
              Judge once in six months, till final hearing and disposal of
              the appeal, commencing from the date he tenders bail
              papers and thereafter, the trial Judge to fix dates for his
              subsequent appearances.

      (vi)    In case of two consecutive defaults on the part of the
              applicant to remain present before the trial Court, the trial
              Court to inform this Court about the same and in that
              eventuality, the prosecution would be at liberty to file an
              application for cancellation of the bail granted to the
              applicant.

      (vii)   Bail before the trial Court.



                                        [ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]
SMS


                                                                             3 of 3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.