Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PUSHPAMALA GOPINATHRAO NALAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
APPLICATION ALLOWED

Holding

The court condoned the 19‑day delay and allowed the criminal revision application to be registered.

Summary

The applicant, Pushpamala Gopinathrao Nalawade, filed a criminal revision application 19 days after the prescribed period and sought condonation of the delay. The respondent State of Maharashtra, through counsel, opposed the condonation on the ground that the delay was not properly explained. The learned judge examined the contents of the application and found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the 19‑day lapse. Consequently, the court held that the delay could be condoned. The criminal revision application was therefore ordered to be registered. The decision underscores the court's discretion to condone procedural delays when a reasonable justification is shown.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 19 days in filing a criminal revision application can be condoned under procedural law

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • criminal revision
  • procedural law
  • court discretion

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41325
                                                                      12.APPLN.4455.2022.odt



                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                       CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4455 OF 2022
                                         IN
               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 12396 OF 2022

          Pushpamala Gopinathrao Nalawade                           ...Applicant

                   Versus

          The State of Maharashtra and Others                       ...Respondents

                                            ***
           Mr. Choudhari Abhijit G., Advocate for the Applicant.
           Mr. Madhukar A. Aher AGP/APP for Respondent – State.
           Mr. Z. H. Farooqui h/f Mr. Chatterji Joydeep, Advocate for Respondent
           Nos.2, 4 and 5.
                                            ***

                                                CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
                                                DATE : SEPTEMBER 07, 2026
          PER COURT :

          1.                 This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 19

          days in filing the Criminal Revision Application.


          2.                 Mr. Farooqui, learned counsel holding for Mr. Chatterji,

          learned counsel for the Respondent, however, opposes the present

          application on the ground that the delay has not been properly

          explained.


          3.                 After going through the contents of the application and

          having satisfied that the delay is properly explained, the application is

          Shrikant Malani                                                        Page 1 of 2
                                                             12.APPLN.4455.2022.odt



allowed.          The delay of 19 days in filing the Criminal Revision

Application is hereby condoned.


4.                The Criminal Revision Application be registered.




                                             ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )




Shrikant Malani                                                         Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.