Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANJEEVANI BALASAHEB PUND AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
APPLICATION ALLOWED

Holding

The court held that where the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the complainant has withdrawn the complaint, the FIR and related criminal proceedings may be quashed.

Summary

The applicants filed a criminal application seeking the quashing of FIR No. 0990/2025 registered at Rahuri Police Station for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the pendency of the application the parties reached an amicable settlement, verified by the Registrar and recorded in a joint consent affidavit. Respondent No. 2, the wife, also filed a mutual‑consent divorce petition under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act and agreed to withdraw the criminal complaint, having received the disputed gold ornaments. The court examined the settlement and the withdrawal and held that the criminal proceedings could be set aside. Accordingly, the FIR, the charge‑sheet, the order taking cognizance and the pending criminal case were quashed and the application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether an FIR and pending criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant’s withdrawal of the complaint.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • quash FIR
  • amicable settlement
  • withdrawal of complaint
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • mutual consent divorce

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41571-DB
                                               1                    925APPLN4572.2025.odt

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           925 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4572 OF 2025

                                Sanjeevani Balasaheb Pund And Others
                                                VERSUS
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Another
                                                   ...
                                 Mr. S. A. Gaikwad - APP for the State
                            Mr. Rahul Patil – Advocate for Respondent No. 2
                                                   ...

                                        CORAM :      HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
                                        DATED :      04TH SEPTEMBER, 2026


               PER COURT :

               1.           The present application has been filed seeking quashing of

               FIR bearing No. 0990/2025, dated 4th September 2025, registered with

               Rahuri Police Station, District Ahilyanagar, for offences punishable under

               Sections 115(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352 and 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya

               Sanhita, 2023, and the consequential proceedings arising therefrom,

               including the filing of the charge-sheet, the order taking cognizance and

               R.C.C. No. 519/2025 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate

               First Class, Rahuri.


               2.           The record indicates that, during the pendency of the

               application, the informant and the applicants have made efforts to

               amicably settle the entire dispute amongst themselves. In view of the

               above, the parties were relegated to the Registrar (Judicial) of this

               Court.
                                2                   925APPLN4572.2025.odt

3.           Upon verification of the terms of settlement, the learned

Registrar (Judicial) has submitted a report dated 31.07.2026, wherein it

is recorded that the matter has been settled and that the consent and

credentials of the parties have been verified. The report is accompanied

by copy of the joint consent affidavit filed by Respondent No. 2 and the

newly added Applicant No. 10, who has represented Applicant Nos. 1 to

9 as well as himself.


4.           It is agreed between the parties that the dispute has been

amicably settled. Respondent No. 2-wife has filed a petition for divorce

by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act before

the Family Court at Beed. The terms of settlement have been

incorporated in paragraph 7 of the said petition for divorce by mutual

consent, and the parties are ready and willing to abide by the same.


5.           The learned Advocate also submits that Respondent No. 2

has agreed to withdraw the complaint filed against the present

applicants at Rahuri Police Station, which is the present impugned

complaint, as well as the proceedings pending before the Rahuri Court.

She has also stated that she has received the gold ornaments from her

husband and that there is nothing that remains to be given or returned.

Taking into consideration the fact that the parties have already

separated, and also taking into consideration the joint consent affidavit

filed by the parties before this Court, this Court proceeds to allow the
                                                                  3                   925APPLN4572.2025.odt

                             application. Hence, the following order:


                                                                  ORDER
                                      [i]     The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘a’

                                              thereof, in view of the amicable settlement arrived at

                                              between the parties, as recorded in the joint consent

                                              affidavit filed by Respondent No. 2 and the newly added

                                              Applicant No. 10.

                                      [ii]    FIR bearing No. 0990/2025, dated 4th September 2025,

                                              registered with Rahuri Police Station, District Ahilyanagar,

                                              for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 3(5),

                                              351(2), 352 and 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023,

                                              and the consequential proceedings arising therefrom,

                                              including the charge-sheet, the order taking cognizance and

                                              R.C.C. No. 519/2025 pending before the learned Judicial

                                              Magistrate First Class, Rahuri, stand quashed and set aside.

                                      [iii]   The joint consent affidavit filed by Respondent No. 2 and

                                              the newly added Applicant No. 10 is taken on record.

                                      [iv]    No order as to costs.




                                                                         [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ]
                                                                                  JUDGE

                             SG Punde



Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 09/09/2026 18:29:14


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.