Bombay High Court
PRAYAGBAI NIVRUTTI MHASKEversusNIVRUTTI NAMDEV MHASKE
- Disposal
- Disposed off/Dismissed for default
Holding
The court held that the 221‑day delay in filing the revision application was condonable.
Summary
The petitioner, Prayagbai Nivrutti Mhaske, filed an application seeking condonation of a 221‑day delay in filing a criminal revision application. The sole respondent, Nivrutti Namdev Mhaske, was served but did not appear. The court, after hearing the applicant's counsel, considered the reasons for the delay. It allowed the application, condoning the delay, and disposed of the criminal application. The revision application was subsequently registered and a notice was issued to the respondent.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 221 days in filing a criminal revision application can be condoned
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- criminal revision
- procedural law
- high court
Judgment
4730.25appln
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
941 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4730 OF 2025
IN / WITH
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 13113 OF 2025
PRAYAGBAI NIVRUTTI MHASKE
VERSUS
NIVRUTTI NAMDEV MHASKE
…..
Mr R. C. Bramhankar, Advocate for Applicant
…..
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026
P. C. :
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4730 OF 2025
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 221
days caused in filing criminal revision application.
2. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant.
3. Despite service to sole respondent, nobody appears on his
behalf.
4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Delay is condoned. This Criminal Application is disposed
of.
5. Criminal Revision Application be registered.
4730.25appln
(2)
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 13113 OF 2025
6. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant.
7. Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 09/09/2026.
[SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.]
sjk
Checking your session…