Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VIVEKANAND NATHRAO SHINDEversusSUDHAKAR VITTHALRAO MISAL AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed.

Summary

The applicant, Sudhakar Vitthalrao Misal, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 808 of 2025) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the last hearing, the applicant's counsel made a statement regarding the filing of a B Summary in the matter, which the applicant later confirmed in writing. The court recorded these written instructions. Relying on this admission, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail application. The court further held that any pending applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the anticipatory bail application should be dismissed on the ground of the filing of a B Summary and the applicant's admission thereof

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • bail application
  • criminal procedure
  • B Summary
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                  -1-
                                                        aba808.25.odt

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

     969 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 808 OF 2025 WITH
              CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 680 OF 2026
                        IN ABA/808/2025

Sudhakar Vitthalrao Misal                        ….Applicant

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & another               …..Respondents

Mr. P. A. Dhakane, Advocate holding for Mr. S. E. Shekade, Advocate
for Applicant.
Ms. P. J. Bharad, APP for the State.

                                CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
                                DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
PER COURT :


1.     Mentioned out of turn.
2.     On the last date of hearing, learned Counsel for the Applicant
has made a statement with regard to B Summary being filed in this
matter.
3.     Learned APP on written instructions confirms the said fact.
Written instructions are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for
identification.
4.     In view of the above, application stands dismissed.
5.     Pending application, if any, does not survive and stands
disposed of.



                                                 ( R. M. JOSHI, J.)

dyb


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.