Bombay High Court

SRIKANTH BALASAHEB KIRDANT AND OTHERSversusASHABAI SHRIKANT KIRDANT

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court condoned the 150‑day delay and disposed of the criminal revision application.

Summary

The applicants filed a criminal application seeking condonation of a 150‑day delay in filing a criminal revision. The revision was intended to pre‑empt execution of an impugned order against the respondent wife, but the record showed no execution steps had been taken. The applicant argued that his grievance was presently redressed but might arise again if execution were initiated. The court, after considering the reasons, condoned the delay and disposed of the revision application, granting the liberty sought. The matter was thus closed pending any future execution proceedings.

Issues considered

Whether a delay of 150 days in filing a criminal revision can be condoned under procedural law
Whether the revision application should be dismissed or disposed of on the basis that the impugned order has not been executed

Subjects

condonation of delay
criminal revision
execution of order
procedural law
High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38428




                                                  -1-

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             901 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 799 OF 2020
                                        IN REVNST/63/2020

                            SRIKANTH BALASAHEB KIRDANT AND OTHERS
                                            VERSUS
                                   ASHABAI SHRIKANT KIRDANT

              Mr.B.S.Chondhekar, Advocate for the Applicants.

                                     ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )

                                        DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2026

              PER COURT :

                                 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 799 OF 2020


              1.             This application is filed for condonation of delay of 150

              days caused in filing the Criminal Revision Application.



              2.             For the reasons stated in the Application, delay stands

              condoned and the instant application stands disposed of.


                     CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.63 OF 2020

              3.             The learned Advocate for the Applicants states that this

              Revision was filed since the respondent/wife was about to execute the

              impugned order. However, it reveals from the record that the wife has


              khs/Aug.2026/799
                                   -2-

not taken any initiative to execute the impugned order. He, therefore,

submits that as of now his grievance is redressed. However, in the

future, if respondent/wife initiates the execution proceeding, he may

permit to approach this Court again.



4.             In view of the above, this Revision Application stands

disposed of on instructions of the Applicant, with liberty as prayed for.



                                         ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)




khs/Aug.2026/799

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…