Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHIVRAJ GANESH BUCAHDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The revision application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had already been acquitted.

Summary

Shivraj Ganesh Buchde filed a criminal revision application challenging the rejection of his discharge application. The applicant relied on an order dated 21 August 2025 from the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, which had acquitted him of the charges. The learned counsel argued that, in view of the acquittal, the revision was rendered infructuous. Justice Ashish S. Chavan examined the matter and held that the revision could not proceed since the applicant was already acquitted. Consequently, the revision application was disposed of as infructuous and the underlying criminal application was also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of an acquittal on a pending revision application challenging a discharge order?

Subjects

  • revision
  • acquittal
  • discharge
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

            Digitally signed by
SMITA       SMITA JOHNSON
JOHNSON     GONSALVES
            Date: 2026.09.21
GONSALVES   10:34:19 +0530




                                  sg                                                                            25.revnst578-18.docx


                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        Criminal Revision Application (Stamp) No.578 of 2018

                                                                With
                                                Criminal Application No.547 of 2018
                                                                 In
                                        Criminal Revision Application (Stamp) No.578 of 2018


                     Shivraj Ganesh Buchde                                                                     … Applicant
                                       versus
                     The State of Maharashtra                                                                  … Respondent
                                                       ----
                     Mr. Kuldeep Patil, for the Applicant.

                     Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP, for the Respondent/ State.
                                                     ----
                                                                                   Coram: Ashish S. Chavan, J.
                                                                                   Date: 18th September, 2026.
                     P.C.:

                     1.                Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that by way of a

                     revision application, rejection of the discharge application filed by the

                     Applicant is assailed. However, he has tendered an order and

                     judgment passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune dated 21 st

                     August, 2025 which indicates that the Applicant is now acquitted. He

                     submits that in view thereof, the revision application has been

                     rendered infructuous. In light of the submission made on behalf of the

                                                                       Page 1 of 2
                                                          __________________________________________________

                                                           18th September, 2026
      sg                                                                                25.revnst578-18.docx


Applicant and taking note of the order of the Additional Sessions

Judge, Pune dated 21st August, 2025, the revision application is

disposed of as infructuous.          In view of the disposal of the revision

application, the criminal application taken out therein is also disposed

of.

                                                                                   (Ashish S. Chavan, J.)




                                           Page 2 of 2
                              __________________________________________________

                               18th September, 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.