Bombay High Court
ASHOK VITTHAL MANDALEversusTHE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS (SURFACE), NEW DELHI AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- ARIF S DOCTOR
Holding
Leave to withdraw the arbitration appeal was not granted and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The appellant filed Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court and subsequently sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The court considered the request to withdraw at a relatively advanced stage of the proceedings. It held that the appellant's request could not be entertained and dismissed the application as withdrawn. Consequently, the appeal stands dismissed. No substantive merits of the underlying dispute were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether leave to withdraw an arbitration appeal can be granted at the stage at which the application was filed
Subjects
- Arbitration
- Withdrawal of appeal
- Civil appellate jurisdiction
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
1/1 37 & 52-ARA-6-2024 (C).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
(37) ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2024
Ashok Vitthal Mandale ...Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India, Ministry Of Road Transport
And Highways (surface), New Delhi And Ors. ...Respondents
AND
(52) INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10232 OF 2024
IN
ARBITRATION APPEAL (ST) NO. 21272 OF 2023
Madhav Bandu Pawar ...Appellant
Versus
Competent Authority National Highway Authority Of India
And Dy. Collector India ...Respondents
_______
Mr. Vivek Punjabi a/w Mr. Sahil Panjwani & Mr. Ritik Gupta for the Appellant.
Mr. Sambhaji Kharatmol, Mr. Suhas Urgunde for the Respondent No.2-NHAI.
Ms. Rashmi S. Tendulkar AGP for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
_______
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2026
P.C.
1. Learned counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the captioned
Appeal, the same is thus dismissed as withdrawn.
[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]
Areeb
Checking your session…