Bombay High Court

Ms Galpha Laboratories LtdversusMs Marksans Pharma Limited

Decided: 2 September 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The order dated 2 September 2026 shall be read with ‘three months’ in place of ‘three weeks’ and ‘learned counsel for the Respondent’ in place of ‘counsels’.

Summary

The petition was filed by Galpha Laboratories Ltd. against Marksans Pharma Ltd. seeking correction of typographical errors in the arbitration tribunal’s order dated 2 September 2026. The petitioner pointed out that the order incorrectly recorded the extension of the tribunal’s mandate as ‘three weeks’ instead of the intended ‘three months’, and that the term ‘counsels’ should read ‘learned counsel for the Respondent’. The respondent’s counsel accepted the correction. The Court examined the petition and agreed that the errors were purely clerical. Accordingly, the Court ordered that the order be read with the corrected terms. The correction was effected without altering any substantive rights of the parties.

Issues considered

Whether the typographical errors in the arbitration tribunal’s order can be corrected by the Court

Subjects

Arbitration
Typographical correction
Court order amendment
Civil Procedure

Judgment

                                                               1/2            ARBP-422-2026 (NOB-2).DOC



SAIRAJ
SANJAY                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KARANDE
Digitally signed by
                                            ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SAIRAJ SANJAY
KARANDE
Date: 2026.09.08
12:25:40 +0530
                                              ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 422 OF 2026


                      Ms. Galpha Laboratories Ltd.                           … Petitioner
                                      Vs.
                      Ms. Marksans Pharma Limited                            … Respondent
                                                            _______
                      Mr. H. S. Gupta i/b Mr. S. R. Gupta for Petitioner.
                      Mr. Bhavya Ganatra i/b Corporate Attorneys for Respondent.
                                                            _______


                                                  CORAM         :      ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
                                                  DATE          :      7th SEPTEMBER, 2026.


                      P.C.


                      1.       Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Board.


                      2.       Praecipe has been moved for speaking to the minutes of the order


                      dated 2nd September, 2026.


                      3.       Learned counsel for the Respondent points out that though the


                      mandate of the Tribunal had been extended for a period of three months,


                      the order incorrectly records the period as three weeks therefore, in


                      paragraph no. 3, the word ‘three weeks’ be read as three months.




                      Sairaj
                                      2/2           ARBP-422-2026 (NOB-2).DOC


Furthermore, in paragraph no. 4, the word ‘counsels’ be read as learned


counsel for the Respondent.


4.       Order dated 2nd September, 2026 to be read accordingly.




                                                         (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)




Sairaj

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.