Bombay High Court
Airwide Express Cargo Pvt LtdversusUnion of India
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
Holding
The order dated 28th August 2026 shall be read with the substitution of ‘Arbitrator’ by ‘learned Single Judge’.
Summary
The High Court of Bombay, while hearing Arbitration Petition No. 430 of 2026 filed by Airwide Express Cargo Pvt. Ltd. against the Union of India and others, considered a petition to amend the wording in its earlier order dated 28th August 2026. The petitioner sought to replace the term “Arbitrator” with “learned Single Judge”. The court, after hearing counsel, agreed to the amendment and directed that the original order be read with the substituted wording. No substantive merits of the dispute were addressed. The order thus stands amended as per the court’s direction.
Issues considered
- Whether the term ‘Arbitrator’ in the order dated 28th August 2026 can be substituted with ‘learned Single Judge’
Subjects
- Arbitration
- Procedural amendment
- Court order
- Terminology substitution
Judgment
Digitally
signed by
VAIBHAV
1/1 P4-ARBP-430-2026.DOC
VAIBHAV NAMDEV
NAMDEV BARE
BARE Date:
2026.09.03
18:01:13
+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 430 OF 2026
Airwide Express Cargo Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents
_______
Mr. Arpik Ashok i/b Sumandevi Yadav, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rushikesh Bhorania i/b Chetan Agrawal, for the Respondents.
_______
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 2nd SEPTEMBER, 2026
P.C.
1. Mentioned. Not on board. Taken on board for Speaking to the Minutes of
the order dated 28th August 2026.
2. Learned counsel points out that, in Paragraph No.1, the word “Arbitrator”
be deleted and substituted with the words “learned Single Judge”.
3. The original order dated 28th August 2026 shall be read accordingly.
[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]
Vaibhav
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.