Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ADITYA BIRLA CAPITAL LIMITEDversusSUPREET KUMAR

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court granted the relief under prayer clause (b) due to the respondent's failure to disclose, and directed other reliefs to be sought before the Arbitral Tribunal.

Summary

Aditya Birla Capital Limited filed an arbitration petition against Supreet Kumar alleging that the respondent failed to file the disclosure ordered by the Court. The petitioner sought relief under prayer clause (b) of the petition. The Court held that the respondent's non‑compliance established a case for granting the relief sought in clause (b). It directed that any other reliefs sought by the petitioner must be pursued before the Arbitral Tribunal. Consequently, the petition was disposed with the specific relief granted.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondent's failure to file the court‑directed disclosure justifies granting the relief sought under prayer clause (b).
  • Whether the petitioner must approach the Arbitral Tribunal for any other reliefs.

Subjects

  • Arbitration
  • Disclosure
  • Court Direction
  • Relief
  • Arbitral Tribunal
  • Petition

Judgment

                                                                                48-arbp-451-2026.doc


                        Vivekanand

           Digitally
                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
           signed by
           VIVEKANAND
VIVEKANAND RAJENDRA
                                     ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
RAJENDRA   BONDE
BONDE      Date:
           2026.10.09
           16:49:25
           +0530                      ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 451 OF 2026

                        Aditya Birla Capital Limited                    … Petitioner
                                    V/s.
                        Supreet Kumar                                   … Respondent

                        Mr. Gaurav Jain a/w Adv. Malavika Sreejith i/b
                        Indialaw LLP, for the Petitioner.
                        Mr. Moksh Jain i/b Wadhwa & Co., for the Respondent.


                                                      CORAM        : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                                                      DATED        : OCTOBER 9, 2026
                        P.C.:

                        1.      Since the Respondent has failed to file disclosure as directed
                        by this Court, the Petitioner has made out a case for the grant of
                        relief in terms of prayer Clause (b).

                        2.      As regards other reliefs, it shall be open to the Petitioner to
                        apply before the Arbitral Tribunal.

                        3.      The petition is disposed of.


                                                                        (AMIT BORKAR, J.)




                                                               1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.