Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Kamalasha Infrastructure and EngineeringversusGlobal Enterprises

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petition was filed by Kamalasha Infrastructure and Engineering seeking arbitration against Global Enterprises. The parties' agreement contains Clause Q(a) requiring disputes to be referred to the Managing Director before arbitration, and Clause Q(b) was highlighted by the respondent. Both parties agreed that the dispute had not yet been referred to the Managing Director and consented to do so. Consequently, the petitioner requested to withdraw the arbitration petition. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, noting that the petitioner remains free to initiate arbitration if needed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the arbitration petition can be withdrawn after the parties agree to refer the dispute to the Managing Director as per the arbitration agreement.

Subjects

  • Arbitration
  • Withdrawal of petition
  • Arbitration agreement
  • Dispute referral
  • Managing Director
  • Civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

         Digitally
         signed by                                                              908-ARP-112-26.DOC
         MEERA
MEERA    MAHESH
MAHESH   JADHAV
JADHAV   Date:
         2026.08.24
         13:54:13
         +0530               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                 ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 112 OF 2026


                Kamalasha Infrastructure And Engineering                   ...Petitioner

                       Versus
                Global Enterprises                                         ...Respondent


                                                 ----------
                Mr. Vishal Tambat a/w Ms Rochelle Fernandes and Ms Sejal Mhaskar for
                Petitioner.
                Mr. Rohit Mishra for Respondent.
                                                 ----------

                                                  CORAM:        S. M. MODAK, J.
                                                  DATED:        21st AUGUST, 2026

                P.C.


                  1.   Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner and learned Advocate for

                  the Respondent.


                  2.   Learned Advocate for the Respondent has invited my attention to

                  clause Q(b) of the Agreement at page 28 of the Petition. This agreement is

                  executed between the parties.


                  3.   Clause Q(a) provides for referring the dispute to the Managing

                  Director of the Petitioner’s company. There is a consensus amongst both the

                  parties that earlier it is not referred to the Managing Director. On the basis

                  of the instructions, learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the




                                                  Page 1 of 2
    Meera Jadhav
                                                                          908-ARP-112-26.DOC



           parties will contact the Managing Director of their company. Learned

           Advocate for the Respondent consented to the same.


           4.   In view of above, the Petitioner wants to withdraw the Petition.

           Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.


           5.   If, there is an occasion for appointment of an arbitrator, the Petitioner

           is at liberty to take appropriate steps.




                                                          (S. M. MODAK, J.)




                                            Page 2 of 2
Meera Jadhav


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.