Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M/S VIDARBHA INFOTECH PVT LTD THR ITS SIGNATORY PREETI W/O HEMANT LANJEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR JOINT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE TRAFFIC

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court extended the arbitration mandate till 1 May 2027.

Summary

The petition was filed by M/s Vidarbha Infotech Pvt. Ltd. seeking an extension of the arbitration mandate that had expired on 1 August 2026. The arbitration was being conducted by two former judges of the High Court, with Justice R.M. Sawant (Retired) appointed as presiding arbitrator. The petitioner informed the respondent that the mandate had lapsed and requested an extension up to 1 May 2027, stating that it had already advanced final arguments. The Court examined the stage of the proceedings and found that extending the mandate was necessary to allow completion of the arbitration. Accordingly, the Court ordered that the mandate be extended till 1 May 2027 and disposed of the arbitration petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the arbitration mandate, having expired on 1 August 2026, can be extended to allow completion of the proceedings?

Subjects

  • Arbitration
  • Mandate Extension
  • High Court
  • Civil Appeal
  • Arbitration Petition

Judgment

                       LSP                                  1              3 arp 156.26.doc


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          Arbitration Petition No.156 of 2026

                       M/s. Vidarbha Infotech Pvt. Ltd.            …              Petitioner
                             V/s.
                       The State of Maharashtra                    …     Respondents.


                       Mr. Pankaj D. Purway a/w.    Advocate for the Petitioner
                       Shubham Yadav and Raju Yadav
                       Mr. A.R. Patil               Addl. G.P. for the State.

                                                   CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J

                                                      DATE : 24th September 2026.

                       P.C. :

                       1.       Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner and learned AGP.

                       2.       As per the order dated 19th October 2022, two former Judges
                       of this Court are appointed as Arbitrator with direction that they will

LATA
          Digitally
          signed by
          LATA SUNIL
         PANJWANI
                       appoint the presiding Arbitrator and Justice R.M.Sawant (Retired) is
SUNIL
PANJWANI Date:
         2026.09.24
          19:26:14
          +0530

                       appointed as a presiding Arbitrator. The mandate for arbitration was
                       lastly extended as per the order dated 11th December 2025. The
                       mandate has expired on 1st August 2026. There is an email sent by
                       the Petitioner to the Respondent informing that mandate has expired
                       that is why the present petition for extension of the mandate.

                       3.       About the stage of the arbitration proceedings it is submitted
LSP                                 2            3 arp 156.26.doc


that Petitioner has already advanced final arguments. The extension
of mandate sought is upto 1st May 2027. In view of that, let mandate
be extended till 1st May 2027.

4.    Arbitration Petition is disposed of.



                                             (S.M. MODAK, J.)


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.