Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANTOSH HARILAL YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

Bail is granted to the applicant under Section 439 CrPC, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The applicant, Santosh Harilal Yadav, a delivery person, was arrested on 2 February 2023 for allegedly unloading narcotic substances—110 boxes of Alprazolam tablets and 240 kg of Codeine Phosphate syrup—from a vehicle registered MH 46 BU 4295. The prosecution alleged that he received the contraband from the driver, who was not named as an accused, and charged him under Sections 8(c) read with 21(c), 22(c), 28 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The applicant had been in custody for more than three years and four months, while co‑accused persons had been released on bail, raising concerns of parity and prolonged pre‑trial detention. The Court, applying Section 439 of the CrPC, considered the length of incarceration, the lack of direct evidence linking the applicant to the loading of the drugs, and the principle of equality among co‑accused. It granted bail subject to a personal bond of Rs. 25,000, sureties, and a series of reporting and non‑interference conditions, without expressing any view on the merits of the case. The bail order was pronounced and the application disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 439 CrPC in a non‑bailable NDPS offence given the nature of the alleged contraband.
  • Whether the prolonged pre‑trial detention of over three years, in contrast to co‑accused released on bail, warrants the grant of bail on grounds of parity and the right to a speedy trial.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • pre‑trial detention
  • parity among co‑accused
  • narcotics
  • delivery person
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                                                                                   54.BA.108.2025.doc

HARSHADA H. SAWANT
      (P.A.)
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                BAIL APPLICATION NO.108 OF 2025

              Santosh Harilal Yadav                                          .. Applicant
                         Versus
              Union Of India                                                 .. Respondent
                                      ....................
               Ms. Loachan Chandka (appearing through Video Conferencing)
                a/w. Mr. Rohan Hogde and Mr. Aaushal Sontakke, Advocates for
                Applicant.
               Ms. Manisha Jagtap, Advocate for Respondent.
               Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, APP for State.
                                               ...................

                                              CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                              DATE          : SEPTEMBER 24, 2026
              P.C.:

              1.         Heard Ms. Chandka, learned Advocate for Applicant

              appearing through Video Conferencing and Ms.                        Jagtap, learned

              Advocate for Respondent.


              2.         This is an Application under Section 439 of the Code of

              Criminal    Procedure,     1973      seeking           Bail   in   connection    with

              NCB/MZU/CR-01 of 2023 registered with Narcotics Control Bureau for

              offences punishable under Section 8(c) read with Section 21(c), 22(c),

              28 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,

              1985 (for short ‘the said Act’).


              3.         The present Application seeks bail for the Applicant who has

              been arrested on 02.02.2023 in NDPS case and the charge of the



                                                                                              1 of 4
                                                       54.BA.108.2025.doc


prosecution is of having recovered the alleged contraband of 110 small

boxes of Alprazolam tablets and 240 kg of Codeine Phosphate syrup in

20 carton boxes, which were loaded in a vehicle bearing number MH

46 BU 4295.


4.        The Applicant before me is a delivery person who had

booked the said Tempo through the online portal app for delivery.

Driver of the vehicle, Alim Ahmed Shah has not been arrayed as an

Accused who could have given the lead to the prosecution as to who

had loaded the said alleged contraband. Charge against the Applicant

before me is that he had unloaded the contraband substance on the

said delivery having been received and the delivery having been given

to him by the driver of the said vehicle.


5.        Apart from the usual non-compliances, the long incarceration

of the Applicant pending trial for more than 3 years and 4 months and

the other co-accused persons having been released on bail and

therefore considering parity and the ignominy of the trial not being

completed in the near foreseeable future persuades me to consider the

Application for grant of bail.


6.        Considering the aforesaid, Applicant is released on bail

subject to following conditions:-


          (i)   Applicant is directed to be immediately released from

                prison in connection with Crime No. NCB/MZU/CR-01

                                                                  2 of 4
                                                54.BA.108.2025.doc


     of 2023;


(ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on

     furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five

     Thousand only) with one or two surety / sureties of the

     like amount;

(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at

     Narcotics Control Bureau, once every month on the first

     Monday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00

     p.m.;

(iv) Applicant shall co-operate with the conduct of trial and

     attend the Trial Court on all dates, unless specifically

     exempted     and   will   not   take   any     unnecessary

     adjournments, if he does so it will entitle the

     prosecution to apply for revocation of this order;

(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra

     without prior permission of the Trial Court;

(vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or

     tamper with the evidence in any manner;

(vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed

     of his current address and mobile contact number and /

     or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from

     time to time, as applicable; and

(viii)Any infraction of the conditions shall entail cancellation

                                                           3 of 4
                                                                                  54.BA.108.2025.doc


                                           of bail granted to the Applicant.

               7.               It is clarified that the observations made in this order are

               limited for the purpose of granting Bail only and I have not made any

               observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on

               the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being

               uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made

               hereinabove in this order.


               8.               Bail Application is allowed and disposed of in the above

               terms.



H. H. SAWANT                                                        [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]


                        Digitally signed
                        by HARSHADA
               HARSHADA HANUMANT
               HANUMANT SAWANT
               SAWANT   Date:
                        2026.09.24
                        15:05:47 +0530




                                                                                             4 of 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.