Bombay High Court
LAXMAN SAKHARAM GHAGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
Bail is granted to the applicant subject to the conditions specified in the order.
Summary
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (CR No. 909 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, Laxman Sakharam Ghagare, was the first accused among four, while two co‑accused had already been released on bail. The court noted a dichotomy in the FIR statements and observed that the sole medical evidence did not conclusively link the applicant to the use of an axe, creating reasonable doubt about his role. Relying on the principle of parity and the lack of a clear prima facie case, the bench granted bail subject to stringent conditions. The order expressly limited its observations to bail and reserved a full trial on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to Accused No.1 under Section 483 BNSS given the ambiguities in the FIR and medical evidence
- Whether the principle of parity among co‑accused warrants release of the applicant
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 109(1), 3(5)
- Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483
Subjects
- bail
- prima facie
- weapon ambiguity
- Section 483 BNSS
- criminal procedure
- co-accused
- parity
- conditions of bail
Judgment
44. BA 1143-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1143 OF 2026
Laxman Sakharam Ghagare .Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
Ms. Sana Raees Khan a/w. Mr. Suraj Mulik, Advocates, for the
ANAND Applicant
SUDHAKAR Ms. Anuja S. Gotad, APP, for the Respondent – State
SUDAME
Digitally signed by Mr. Utkarsh R. Pondkule i/b. Mr. Prashant Hagare, Advocates, for the
ANAND SUDHAKAR
SUDAME
Date: 2026.10.07
Complainant
16:12:34 +0530
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : 05.10.2026
P. C.
1. Heard Ms. Khan, learned Counsel for the Applicant, Ms. Gotad,
learned APP for the Respondent – State and Mr. Pondkule, learned
Counsel for the Complainant.
2. This Application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) in connection with
C.R.No. 909 of 2024 registered with Daund Police Station, Pune for
offences punishable under Sections 109(1) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”).
3. The Applicant is one of the four co-accused persons in the
present crime. He is arraigned as Accused No. 1. Accused Nos. 2 and 3
Anand 1 of 4
44. BA 1143-2026.doc
are already enlarged on bail. Prima facie reading of the FIR statement
at page No. 28 & 29 when juxtaposed with the statement appended at
page No. 33 shows a clear dichotomy with regard to the facts. It is
prima facie seen that the aggressor out of the Accused persons are
Accused Nos. 2 & 4. Accused No. 2 has already been granted bail, copy
of order is appended to the Application. Insofar as role of Accused No.
1 is concerned, save and except the Complainant/First Informant
stating that she had seen him along with the other Accused persons
hitting her husband, there is nothing else which is stated on record.
Merely hitting her husband cannot be construed as Applicant having
used the Axe to hit her husband because of the simple reason that the
Medical Certificate does not support the prosecution case. There is only
one grievous injury which may have probably been caused with the
weapon in question, whereas the other injuries are simple in nature, as
can be seen from the record. Further, it is prima facie ambiguous as to
who has used the weapon to inflict the blow. In that view of the matter,
in view of parity been applicable, the Applicant is granted bail.
4. Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and finding,
Bail Application of Applicant is allowed subject to the following terms
and conditions:-
Anand 2 of 4
44. BA 1143-2026.doc
(i) Applicant – Laxman Sakharam Ghagare is directed to be
immediately released from prison in connection with
CR. No. 909 of 2024;
(ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on furnishing
P. R. Bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rs. Thirty Thousand only)
with one surety of the like amount;
(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at
Daund Police Station, Pune, once every month, on the
first Monday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00
p.m. until commencement of trial and thereafter shall
attend all dates of hearing before the Trial Court;
(iv) Applicant shall co-operate with the conduct of the trial
and remain present before the Trial Court on all dates,
unless specifically exempted. Applicant shall not seek
unnecessary adjournments. Any such conduct shall
entitle the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail;
(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra
without prior permission of the Trial Court;
(vi) Applicant shall not enter the jurisdiction of Daund Police
Station, Pune except for attending the trial;
Anand 3 of 4
44. BA 1143-2026.doc
(vii) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or
tamper with the evidence in any manner;
(viii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed
of his current residential address and mobile telephone
number and shall forthwith inform the Investigating
Officer of any change in his residential address or
mobile telephone number, as and when such change
occurs; and
(ix) Any breach or infraction of any of the aforesaid
conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail granted to
the Applicant.
5. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are limited
for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any
observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on
the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being
uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made
hereinabove in this order.
6. Bail Application is allowed and disposed in the above terms.
(MILIND N. JADHAV, J.)
Anand 4 of 4
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.