Bombay High Court
SHADUL NAZIR SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- Withdrawn
Holding
The bail application was dismissed as withdrawn, with the trial directed to be concluded within twenty sessions and a provision to reapply for bail if the trial does not substantially proceed.
Summary
Shadul Nazir Shaikh applied for bail on the ground of prolonged incarceration, filing a successive bail application after the trial had commenced. The applicant argued that only three of the eighteen scheduled witnesses had been examined and the trial was proceeding slowly. The prosecution indicated that the remaining fifteen witnesses could be examined within twenty court sessions. The Court directed the trial court to complete the trial within twenty sessions from the date of the order, noting that any delays caused by the accused would not be counted. The bail application was dismissed as withdrawn, with the applicant permitted to file a fresh bail request if the trial does not substantially progress after the stipulated sessions.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate basis for granting bail in a successive bail application predicated on trial delay?
Subjects
- bail
- successive bail application
- trial delay
- right to speedy trial
- criminal procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:46097
-1-
939-BA-1147-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1147 OF 2026
SHADUL NAZIR SHAIKH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
.....
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Satej S. Jadhav
APP for Respondent - State : Mr. S. A. Gaikwad
.....
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
DATED : 30th SEPTEMBER 2026
PER COURT :
1. Heard learned counsel for respective parties.
2. Present application is successive bail application filed
only on the ground of long incarceration.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant clearly submits that
the trial has started. However, though three witnesses are
examined, the trial is not proceeding with a great pace.
4. Learned APP submits that three witnesses have been
examined out of total eighteen witnesses and there are only fifteen
witnesses more. He submits that the prosecution will assist the
Trial Court and make an endeavor to conclude the trial within a
period of twenty sessions.
Tandale
-2-
939-BA-1147-2026
5. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the Trial
Court be directed in accordance with the statement made by the
learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
6. Taking into consideration that there are only eighteen
witnesses, out of which three of them are already examined,
according to me, it will be appropriate to direct the learned Trial
Court to conclude the trial within a period of twenty sessions from
today.
7. In the light of above, the application stands dismissed
as withdrawn. After conclusion of twenty sessions, if the trial has
not substantially proceeded, the applicant is at liberty to renew his
request.
8. The time consumed by the accused persons in not
permitting the trial to proceed, or due to some absence, will not be
taken into consideration while counting the twenty sessions.
(HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR)
JUDGE
Tandale
Checking your session…