Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ASHIQBHAI MAHADEVBHAI NAAYEE @ NAI AASHIKBHAI MAHADEVBHAI AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Bail is granted to the applicants subject to the stipulated conditions.

Summary

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by two accused (Ashiqbhai Naayee and Pravinbhai Rabari) charged under IPC sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 for alleged involvement in a fixed‑deposit fraud scheme. The prosecution alleged that the principal accused received Rs.14.53 crore and used the applicants' bank accounts as mule accounts, paying them Rs.20,000 each. The defence argued that, on the principle of parity, the applicants' role was minor compared to other co‑accused who had already been released on bail after receiving much larger sums. The court found that the prima facie case against the applicants was limited to the modest amount received and therefore granted bail, imposing standard conditions such as surety, reporting, and passport surrender. The order expressly limited its observations to bail and did not address the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • The applicability of Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to grant bail in a fraud case.
  • Whether the principle of parity justifies bail for the accused who acted as mule account holders.
  • Whether the modest amount received (Rs.20,000) warrants bail despite the larger fraud alleged against principal accused.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • parity principle
  • mule account
  • fraud
  • fixed deposit scam
  • IPC
  • Section 483
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                                                               49.BA.1151.2026.doc

Ajay

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1151 OF 2026

       1. Ashiqbhai Mahadevbhai Naayee @ Nai
       Aashikbhai Mahadevbhai
       2. Pravinbhai Ishwarbhai Rabari       .. Applicants
             Versus
       State of Maharashtra                  .. Respondent

                                 ....................
        Mr. Mithilesh Mishra a/w. Ms. Namasvi Bhanushali, Advocates for
         Applicants.
        Mr. Sukanta A. Karmakar, APP for Respondent – State.
        API – Mr. Rameshwar Parve, Crime Branch, Unit – 03, Navi Mumbai
         present.
                                    ......…........…

                                   CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                   DATE        : SEPTEMBER 17, 2026.

       P.C.:

       1.        Heard Mr. Mishra, learned Advocate for Applicants Mr.

       Karmakar, learned APP for Respondent – State.


       2.        This is an Application under Section 483 of Bharatiya

       Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking Bail in connection with

       C.R.No.206 of 2024 registered with Kalamboli Police Station, District

       Raigad for offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and

       471 fo the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’).


       3.        Applicants before the Court are arraigned as Accused Nos.

       11, 14 and 15. Thirty other co-accused persons have all been released



                                                                           1 of 6
                                                        49.BA.1151.2026.doc


on bail by virtue of an order dated 03.09.2026 passed in 4 Bail

Applications and other accused persons were enlarged on bail by a

previous order dated 10.07.2026 passed in Criminal Bail Application

No.2466 of 2025 by my predecessor.


4.         Insofar as the prosecution case is concerned, the prime

accused in the present case are Accused Nos.1, 2, 3 and 5 and they

allegedly received fixed deposits to the tune of Rs.14.53 Crores while

passing the order dated 03.09.2026, I have considered the entire

modus operandi which led to the investments made by several persons

with the principal accused persons with the hope of receiving high

returns.


5.         There is also a case of impersonation which is prima facie

seen in the present case by the principal accused persons on behalf of

UCO Bank of India. This aspect as well as other aspects have also been

revealed when the fixed deposits were received from the Mumbai

Metropolitan Region Iron and Steel Market Committee (for short

‘MMRISMC’).


6.         The role attributed to these two Applicants before me is that

their bank accounts were used as mule accounts for the purpose of

transfer of funds by the principal accused persons. The charge-sheet

prima facie shows that they had received a benefit of Rs.20,000/- each

for giving the details of their bank accounts to be used as a mule


                                                                    2 of 6
                                                        49.BA.1151.2026.doc


account by the other accused persons.


7.        Mr. Mishra would pitch the case on the ground of parity. He

would submit that all other accused persons who have been enlarged

on bail had received substantial amounts in excess of lakhs of rupees

and some of them few crores of rupees. He would submit that both the

Applicants before the Court in order to make a fast buck, gave their

details of their accounts to the other co-accused persons. They both are

Uber drivers in Ahmedabad and had given their details to the principal

accused persons.


8.        Having considered the submissions and the specific role

attributed to the two Applicants before me and also on the basis of the

prosecution material which prima facie does not show the credit of any

substantial amounts save and except the amount of Rs.20,000/-, a

prima facie case is made out for grant of bail on parity for both the

Applicants before me.


9.        Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and

findings, Bail Application of Applicants is allowed subject to the

following terms and conditions:-


          (i)   Applicant – Ashiqbhai Mahadevbhai Naayee @ Nai

                Aashikbhai Mahadevbhai is directed to be immediately

                released from prison in connection with CR. No.206 of

                2024 registered with Kalamboli Police Station, Raigad,

                                                                    3 of 6
                                              49.BA.1151.2026.doc


    upon furnishing a P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-

    with one or two sureties in the like amount to the

    satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panvel

    in R.C.C. No.876 of 2024; Applicant shall furnish one

    surety from Maharashtra and one surety from Gujarat;


(ii) Applicant – Pravinbhai Ishwarbhai Rabari is directed to

    be immediately released from prison in connection with

    CR. No.206 of 2024 registered with Kalamboli Police

    Station, Raigad, upon furnishing a P.R. Bond in the sum

    of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like

    amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate

    First Class, Panvel in R.C.C. No.876 of 2024; Applicant

    shall furnish one surety from Maharashtra and one

    surety from Gujarat;


(iii) Applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any

    inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted

    with the facts of the case to dissuade that person from

    disclosing the facts to the Court or any police officer

    and shall not tamper with evidence;


(iv) The Applicants shall, within three (3) days of their

    release from jail, provide to the Investigating Officer,

    Kalamboli Police Station, Raigad, their residential


                                                          4 of 6
                                               49.BA.1151.2026.doc


     addresses, contact numbers, e-mails and must inform

     the Investigating Officer about any change in the same

     from time to time;


(v) The Applicants shall surrender their passports to the

     Court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panvel, in

     R.C.C.No. 876 of 2024 within three days of their release

     from jail;


(vi) The Applicants shall report to the Investigating Officer,

     Kalamboli Police Station, Raigad on the 2nd and 4th

     Saturday of each month from 11.00 am to 12.00 noon

     till conclusion of trial in R.C.C.No. 876 of 2024;


(vii) The Applicants shall regularly appear before the

     Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panvel in R.C.C.No. 876

     of 2024 as and when the matter is fixed, unless

     specifically exempted;


(viii)If the Applicants abstain from appearing before the

     Trial Court, then the same would be considered as a

     breach of Court conditions and the Court would be at

     liberty to pass appropriate orders; and


(ix) The Applicants shall not leave India without prior

     permission from the Court.



                                                           5 of 6
                                                                                             49.BA.1151.2026.doc


                                      10.       It is clarified that the observations made in this order are

                                      limited for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any

                                      observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on

                                      the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being

                                      uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made

                                      hereinabove in this order.


                                      11.       Bail Application is allowed and disposed in the above terms.



                                                                                [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

         Ajay
                Digitally signed by
AJAY       AJAY TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.09.17
                18:01:09 +0530




                                                                                                         6 of 6


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.