Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ADITYA LAHU SAKATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The bail application is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh application before the trial court if there is no substantial progress in the trial.

Summary

The petitioner, Aditya Lahu Sakat, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release pending trial. The Court expressed its disinclination to grant bail, after which the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application and to file a fresh one after six months. The Court allowed the withdrawal without ordering dismissal and granted liberty to file a fresh application before the trial court if the trial does not make substantial progress. It directed that any fresh application be decided by the trial court on its merits. Consequently, the bail application was disposed of as withdrawn, with a conditional liberty to re‑apply.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bail application can be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application after a specified period.

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • fresh application
  • trial progress
  • high court

Judgment

                                                              1                        56BA1285.2026.odt

                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                             56 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1285 OF 2026

                                                          Aditya Lahu Sakat
                                                                VERSUS
                                                    The State Of Maharashtra
                                                                   ...
                             Mr. Rahul R. Karpe - Advocate for Applicant
                             Mr. S. D. Ghayal – Addl. P. P. for the State
                                                                   ...

                                                        CORAM :      HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.

                                                        DATED :       31ST AUGUST, 2026


                             PER COURT :

                             1.           After hearing the learned Advocate for the Applicant and
                             perusing the records, when this Court expressed its disinclination to
                             allow the Application, the learned Advocate for the Applicant, without
                             inviting any order of dismissal of Application, on instructions seeks
                             permission to withdraw the present Application, with liberty to file a
                             fresh application after a period of six months from today.


                             2.           The Application stands disposed of as withdrawn, with
                             liberty to the Applicant to file a fresh application before the learned Trial
                             Court if there is no substantial progress in the trial.


                             3.           If any such application is filed, the learned Trial Court shall
                             decide the same on its own merits.



                                                                       [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ]
                                                                                JUDGE

                             SG Punde

Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 02/09/2026 18:32:27


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.