Bombay High Court
SANTOSH UTTAM BORSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Santosh Uttam Borse filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay. The learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Chetan Deshmukh, argued for the grant of bail, while the State was represented by Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton. The presiding judge expressed a disinclination to allow the bail and permitted the applicant to withdraw the application with liberty to approach the court later if required. The bail application was therefore treated as withdrawn. Consequently, the court dismissed the bail application.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the applicant in the present case
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- withdrawal
- high court
- dismissal
Judgment
60.BA.1406.2026.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1406 OF 2026
Santosh Uttam Borse .. Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
....................
Mr. Chetan Deshmukh, Advocate for Applicant.
Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, APP for Respondent – State.
HC – Mr. S.D. Gholap, Niphad Police Station present.
......…...........
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 30, 2026.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for Applicant and
Ms. Newton, learned APP for Respondent – State.
2. After expressing my disinclination to Mr. Deshmukh for
allowing the present Bail Application, he would submit that Applicant
be allowed to withdraw the Bail Application with leave and liberty to
the Applicant to approach this Court later in accordance with law.
Reserving such leave and liberty to Applicant as available to him in
law, Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Bail Application is dismissed.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Ajay
Digitally signed
by AJAY
AJAY TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date:
2026.09.30
17:27:46 +0530
1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.