Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJU ALIAS CHANDU SAKHARAM MOHITEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The bail applications were dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Raju Alias Chandu Sakharam Mohite filed bail applications (Nos. 1497 and 1498 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release from custody. The Court, after hearing counsel, expressed its disinclination to grant bail. The applicant's counsel then sought leave to withdraw the applications. The Court granted the leave and dismissed the applications as withdrawn. No substantive merits on bail were decided.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of bail applications when the applicant wishes to withdraw them after the Court has expressed disinclination to grant bail?

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                              1                      932BA1497.2026.odt

                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                            932 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1497 OF 2026

                                              Raju Alias Chandu Sakharam Mohite
                                                             VERSUS
                                                    The State Of Maharashtra
                                                                 ...
                             Mr. Kishor D. Khade - Advocate for Applicant
                             Mr. S. A. Gaikwad - APP for the State
                                                                 ...

                                                               WITH
                                                 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1498 OF 2026
                                                                ...

                                                        CORAM :   HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
                                                        DATED :   10TH SEPTEMBER, 2026

                             PER COURT :

                             1.          After hearing the learned Advocate for the Applicants in

                             both the Applications and perusing the record, when this Court

                             expressed its disinclination to allow the Applications, the learned

                             Advocate for the Applicants, upon instructions, seeks leave to withdraw

                             the Applications.

                             2.          Leave is granted.

                             3.          The Applications stand dismissed as withdrawn.




                                                                   [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ]
                                                                            JUDGE

                             SG Punde




Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 11/09/2026 15:52:27


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.