Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRIRAM BALASAHEB GUNDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh application after the charge-sheet is filed.

Summary

The applicant, Shriram Balasaheb Gund, filed a bail application while the investigation into an alleged assault was still ongoing and no charge-sheet had been filed. The injury report indicated that the applicant caused only simple injuries, while a grievous injury was attributed to his wife, who had already been released on anticipatory bail. The court noted the seriousness of the allegations, including the alleged use of a deadly weapon and assault on a vital part of the body, and expressed disinclination to grant bail at this stage. The applicant, on his brother's instructions, sought to withdraw the bail application and requested permission to file a fresh application after the charge-sheet is filed. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn, granting liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial court once the charge-sheet is filed, and directed the trial court to consider any future application on its merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted when the investigation is ongoing and serious allegations, including use of a deadly weapon, are involved
  • Whether the bail application can be withdrawn and a fresh application filed after the charge-sheet is filed

Subjects

  • bail
  • investigation
  • charge-sheet
  • anticipatory bail
  • serious offenses
  • withdrawal of application

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:36968
                                                -1-
                                                                      39-BA-1512-2026

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1512 OF 2026

                              SHRIRAM BALASAHEB GUND
                                       VERSUS
                       THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

                                              ......
              Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Manoj A. Dond
              APP for Respondent - State : Mr. V. K. Kotecha
                                              .....

                                          CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
                                           DATED : 17th AUGUST 2026
              PER COURT :

              1.          Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and the

              learned APP for the respondent – State.


              2.          Perused the investigation papers.


              3.          Admittedly, the charge-sheet is yet to be filed and the

              investigation is in progress. Learned Advocate for the applicant

              submits that the incident that has taken place was out of a quarrel

              between both sides and it has happened at the spur of moment. The

              injury certificate shows three injuries, out of which only simple

              injuries can be assigned to present applicant, whereas the grievous

              injury is attributed to the assault caused by applicant's wife. He

              submits that applicant's wife has been released on anticipatory

              bail. Though the said order is not placed before this Court, I am still

              of the opinion that the investigation is at an advanced stage and
                                  -2-
                                                         39-BA-1512-2026

the allegations pertaining to use of a deadly weapon and assault on

a vital part of the body. At this stage, I am not inclined to grant bail

to the present applicant.


4.          Upon showing my disinclination, learned Advocate for

the applicant, on instructions from the brother of applicant, seeks

permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file a fresh

application before the Trial Court after filing of the charge-sheet.


5.          The application stands dismissed as withdrawn with

liberty to file a fresh application after the charge-sheet is filed

before the learned Trial Court.


6.          The learned Trial Court shall consider the said

application on its own merits and in accordance with law without

being influenced as to what has been observed in the present order.



                                        (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR)
                                               JUDGE




Tandale


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.