Bombay High Court
HAZAL DONALD CORRIEAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SHYAM C CHANDAK
Holding
The bail application was deemed infructuous and was disposed of.
Summary
The applicant, Hazal Donald Corriea, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The respondent State, through counsel Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, opposed the application. Counsel for Respondent No.2, Ms. Anjali Kondvilkar, submitted that the applicant had already been acquitted in the underlying criminal case. The Court held that, given the acquittal, the bail application was no longer viable. Consequently, the Court declared the application infructuous and disposed of it.
Issues considered
- Whether a bail application remains maintainable after the applicant has been acquitted
Subjects
- bail
- acquittal
- criminal procedure
- application infructuous
- high court
Judgment
HEMANT
CHANDERSEN
SHIV
H.C. SHIV 7.ba1520.24.doc
Digitally signed by
HEMANT
CHANDERSEN SHIV
Date: 2026.02.07
11:37:37 +0300
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1520 OF 2024
Hazal Donald Corriea … Applicant
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent-State.
Ms. Anjali Kondvilkar i/b Megha Bajora, Spl. P.P. for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
DATED : 6th FEBRUARY, 2026
P. C. :
. Ms.Kondvilkar, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent
No.2-DRI, Mumbai states that the Applicant in present Application has
already been acquitted.
2) In view thereof, Application has become infructuous and is
disposed of accordingly.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…