Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AKASH ATMARAM DHANGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The court permitted withdrawal of the bail application and granted liberty to file a fresh application after one year, disposing the pending criminal application.

Summary

Akash Atmaram Dhangar applied for bail in a criminal case. The court, after reviewing the charge sheet, expressed disinclination to grant bail. On the applicant's request, the court allowed the withdrawal of the bail application, granting liberty to file a fresh bail application after one year if the trial does not progress substantially. The withdrawn bail application was disposed of, and the pending criminal application No. 3415 of 2026 was also disposed. Any fresh bail application filed later will be decided on its merits according to law.

Issues considered

  • Whether the bail application can be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application after a specified period
  • Whether the court may dispose of the pending criminal application alongside the bail application

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • trial delay
  • court discretion

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41983
                                                                             936ba1576-26

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           936 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1576 OF 2026

                                  Akash Atmaram Dhangar
                                          VERSUS
                                 The State Of Maharashtra
                                              ...
            Mr. Shaikh Mohammad Naseer A, Advocate for the Applicant
            Ms. A. S. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent-State
                                            WITH
                          CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3415 OF 2026
                                      IN BA/1576/2026

                                   Ganeshgir Jivangir Gosavi
                                           VERSUS
                             The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                               …
            Mr. Sagar P. Mahale, Advocate for the Applicant/informant


                                    CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
                                      Dated : 8th September, 2026
            PER COURT :-

            1.       Heard learned Advocate for the applicant, learned APP for the

            State and learned Advocate for the         informant, briefly.     With the

            assistance of the learned counsel, I have perused the entire charge-

            sheet. Upon showing my disinclination to allow the application, the

            learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of

            the application with liberty to file fresh bail application after a period of

            one year from today, in case the trial does not progress substantially.


            2.       Liberty as prayed is granted. The bail application is disposed

            of as withdrawn.



                                                                                    1 of 2
                                                                      936ba1576-26

           3.       In case the applicant prefers the fresh bail application before

           the trial court, the same be decided on its own merits, in accordance

           with law.


           4.       Pending Criminal Application No. 3415 of 2026 also stands
           disposed of.



                                                     (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.)
JPChavan




                                                                              2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.