Bombay High Court

VICKY ALIAS ANIL POLAD MALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: Withdrawn

Holding

The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh application after one year if the trial shows no substantial progress.

Summary

Vicky alias Anil Polad Mali applied for bail before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant, through counsel, expressed a desire to withdraw the bail application, seeking liberty to file a fresh application after one year if the trial does not make substantial progress. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission for the withdrawal and ordered that the applicant may file a new bail application after a one‑year period, provided the trial remains stagnant. The original bail application was therefore dismissed as withdrawn. The order emphasizes that the liberty to re‑apply is conditional upon lack of substantial progress in the trial.

Issues considered

Whether a bail application can be withdrawn and the applicant be granted liberty to file a fresh application after a specified period if the trial does not progress substantially

Subjects

bail
withdrawal of application
trial progress
liberty to reapply
high court order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43919
                                                 -1-
                                                                    953-BA-1592-2026

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1592 OF 2026

                              VICKY ALIAS ANIL POLAD MALI
                                            VERSUS
                        THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                              .....
              Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Surendra V. Suryawanshi
              APP for Respondent - State : Mr. K. K. Naik
              Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Prafullasing H. Patil
                                              .....

                                           CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
                                           DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2026
              PER COURT :

              1.           Heard learned Advocate for applicant and learned APP.


              2.           Upon showing disinclination to allow the application, on
              instructions, the learned Advocate for applicant seeks withdrawal
              of the application, with liberty to file a fresh application after one
              year from the date of this order, in case there is no substantial
              progress in the trial.

              3.           Permission granted.

              4.           The application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty
              as prayed.

              5.           In case substantial progress is not made in conducting
              the trial, the applicant can prefer a fresh application before the
              learned Trial Court after a period of one year.



                                                       (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR)
                                                              JUDGE

              Tandale

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…