Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ADITYA RAVI BHUJBALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Bail is granted to the applicant subject to conditions.

Summary

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by 22‑year‑old Aditya Ravi Bhujbal, the principal accused in a violent incident involving a scythe that resulted in the victim’s death. The charges include IPC sections 307, 504, 506, 34 (later upgraded to 302), sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act, and sections 37(1) and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that there was no clear motive, he had no prior criminal antecedents, and the co‑accused had already been released on bail. The court examined the prima facie facts, noted the absence of a recorded motive, and gave weight to the applicant’s young age and personal circumstances. It granted bail subject to a personal bond of Rs 25,000, a surety, and detailed reporting and non‑interference conditions, expressly limiting its observations to bail and not the merits of the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted to the principal accused under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 despite the seriousness of the offences.
  • Whether the applicant’s young age, lack of antecedents, and the bail of co‑accused justify granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Section 483 BNSS 2023
  • IPC
  • attempted murder
  • young offender
  • court conditions
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                                            19.BA.17.2026.doc

HARSHADA H. SAWANT
      (P.A.)
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                               BAIL APPLICATION NO.17 OF 2026

              Aditya Ravi Bhujbal                                    .. Applicant
                         Versus
              The State of Maharashtra                               .. Respondent
                                       ....................
               Ms. Shubhangi Parulekar, Advocate for Applicant through Video
                Conferencing.
               Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, APP for Respondent.
               API – Swapnil Patil, Faraskhana Police Station, Pune City.
                                           ...................

                                          CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                          DATE          : AUGUST 24, 2026
              P.C.:

              1.       Heard Ms. Parulekar, learned Advocate for Applicant

              through Video Conferencing and Ms. Phad, learned APP for

              Respondent.


              2.       This is an Application under Section 483 of Bharatiya

              Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking Bail in connection with C.R.

              No.1 of 2023 registered with Faraskhana Police Station, Pune City for

              offences punishable under Sections 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian

              Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’); Section 4 and 25 of the Arms Act,

              1959; Section 37(1) and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.


              3.       Applicant is young offender of 22 years of age at the time of

              incident which occurred 3 years and 8 months ago. Ms. Parulekar

              would submit that there are total five Accused in the crime out of


                                                                                      1 of 4
                                                         19.BA.17.2026.doc


which Accused Nos.2 to 5 have been enlarged on bail. Applicant is

arraigned as principal Accused of having assaulted the victim with

scythe (dks;rk).


4.         Prima facie, after going through the statements which are

recorded by the prosecution, the precise reason as to why the motive is

escribed is not clear. The incident is such that Applicant came to the

Society gate where the victim alongwith his friend whose statement

has been recorded was sitting and threatened the victim by banging

the scythe (dks;rk) on the metal gate of the Society.       There was

substantial abuse between the Applicant as well victim from both the

sides. This enraged the situation and when the Applicant opened the

gate of the Society and entered inside the victim was left alone by all

his other friends who ran away from the spot.       In the subsequent

skirmish which has occurred, the Applicant injured the victim with the

scythe (dks;rk) by inflicting three blows, one on head, one on his neck

and one on his shoulder. Initially, complaint was lodged under Section

307 of the IPC but subsequently the victim succumbed to his injuries

while undertaking treatment, Section 302 of the IPC came to be

applied.


5.         Prima facie, since no specific motive of crime has been

lodged and placed before me and also Ms. Parulekar argued that there

are no antecedents, the young age of Applicant being offender comes


                                                                   2 of 4
                                                               19.BA.17.2026.doc


to the fore to enable me to consider the present Application.


6.        Considering the aforesaid, Applicant has made out case for

grant of bail subject to following conditions:-


          (i)   Applicant is directed to be immediately released from

                prison in connection with Crime No. 1 of 2023;


          (ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on

                furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five

                Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount;

          (iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at the

                concerned Police Station, once every month on the first

                Monday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00

                p.m.;

          (iv) Applicant shall co-operate with the conduct of trial and

                attend the Trial Court on all dates, unless specifically

                exempted    and    will   not     take   any     unnecessary

                adjournments, if he does so it will entitle the

                prosecution to apply for revocation of this order;

          (v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra

                without prior permission of the Trial Court;

          (vi) Applicant shall not influence with any of the witnesses

                or tamper with the evidence in any manner;

          (vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed


                                                                         3 of 4
                                                                                    19.BA.17.2026.doc


                                            of his current address and mobile contact number and /

                                            or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from

                                            time to time, as applicable; and

                              (viii)Any infraction of the conditions shall entail cancellation

                                            of bail granted to the Applicant.

               7.             It is clarified that the observations made in this order are

               limited for the purpose of granting Bail only and I have not made any

               observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on

               the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being

               uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made

               hereinabove in this order.


               8.             Bail Application is allowed and disposed of in the above

               terms.



H. H. SAWANT                                                         [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

                         Digitally signed
                         by HARSHADA
                HARSHADA HANUMANT
                HANUMANT SAWANT
                SAWANT   Date:
                         2026.08.24
                         16:36:22 +0530




                                                                                              4 of 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.