Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VISHAL LAXMAN MHASHALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The Court corrected the Special (POCSO) case number to “41 of 2026” and disposed of the Praecipe.

Summary

The applicant, Vishal Laxman Mhashal, filed Bail Application No. 1769 of 2026 before the High Court of Bombay. An interim application (Praecipe) was filed on 24 September 2026 to correct a clerical error in the earlier order dated 21 September 2026, where the Special (POCSO) case number was incorrectly recorded as “41 of 2025”. The applicant’s counsel, Ms. Shruti P. Ghodake, argued that the correct reference should be “41 of 2026”. The Court examined the submission and directed that the order be read with the corrected case number. Consequently, the Praecipe was disposed, and the original bail order stands with the amended reference.

Subjects

  • bail
  • procedural correction
  • POCSO
  • High Court
  • praecipe

Judgment

                                                                                    P2. CRI BA-1769-26.odt


    Amberkar

                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                            BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1769 OF 2026

               Vishal Laxman Mhashal                                              .. Applicant
                          Versus
               The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                    .. Respondents

                                               WITH
                           INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2887 OF 2026
                                                  IN
                             BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1769 OF 2026
                                          ....................
                Ms. Shruti P. Ghodake & Mr. Siddhartth Nair i/by Mr. Samir A.
                 Vaidya, Advocates for Applicant
                                                        ...................
                                                       CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                       DATE          : SEPTEMBER 24, 2026

               P. C.:
               1.       Not on board. Mentioned by way of filing a praecipe dated
               24.09.2026 for speaking to the minutes of order dated 21.09.2026.

               2.       Heard Ms. Ghodake, learned Advocate for the Applicant. She
               would submit that in paragraph No. 2 of the said order, the Special
               (POCSO) Case number has been incorrectly mentioned as “41 of
               2025” instead of “41 of 2026”. In view thereof, the reference to the
               Special (POCSO) Case number in the said paragraph shall be read as
               “41 of 2026.”

               3.       This order shall be read alongwith the order dated 21.09.2026.

               4.       Praecipe is disposed.



Amberkar                                                            [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
                         Digitally signed
                         by RAVINDRA
               RAVINDRA MOHAN
               MOHAN    AMBERKAR
               AMBERKAR Date:
                         2026.09.24
                         17:24:23 +0530


                                                                                                   1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.