Bombay High Court
YUGANK VINAYKUMAR SHARMA S/O VINAY P SHARMA ACTUALLY KNOWN AS YUGANK VINAYKUMAR SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The High Court granted leave to withdraw the bail applications, disposing them without hearing on merits.
Summary
The applicant, Yugank Vinaykumar Sharma, filed three criminal bail applications before the High Court of Bombay. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel sought leave to withdraw these applications, citing a change in circumstances and the intention to file fresh bail applications before the trial court. The learned judge considered the request and granted leave to withdraw the applications. The court clarified that the applications were not heard on their merits. Consequently, the bail applications were disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court may grant leave to withdraw pending bail applications on the ground of changed circumstances
Subjects
- bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- change in circumstances
- High Court
Judgment
WAKLE
MANOJ MANOJ 903-BA-1786-2026.DOC
JANARDHAN
Digitally signed by
WAKLE MANOJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
JANARDHAN
Date: 2026.10.01
18:00:40 +0530
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1786 OF 2026
WITH
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1788 OF 2026
WITH
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1801 OF 2026
Yugank Vinaykumar Sharma
S/o Vinay P. Sharma
actually known as Yugank Vinaykumar Sharma …Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Siddharth Singh i/by Adv. Ashok M. Saraogi, for the Applicant.
Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
DATED : 1st OCTOBER, 2026
P.C. :-
1. Mr. Singh, learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid Applications with liberty to
file fresh Bail Application before the trial Court, due to change in
circumstances.
2. Leave and liberty to withdraw is granted.
3. Applications stand disposed of as withdrawn.
4. It is clarified that these Applications are not heard on merits.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.