Bombay High Court

SHRI SHUBHAM SHAILESH KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposal: Disposed Off
Bench: SACHIN SHIVAJIRAO DESHMUKH

Holding

The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Shri Shubham Shailesh Kamble filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, seeking release from custody in a case instituted by the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The applicant was represented by Mr. Shrikant Jadhav and Mr. M. P. Kharat, while the State was represented by Ms. A. A. Takalkar and respondent No.2 by Mr. Rahul R. Patil. After hearing the counsel for the applicant, the Court indicated it was not inclined to entertain the bail application. On the instructions of his counsel, the applicant subsequently withdrew the bail application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application as withdrawn and ordered the Legal Services Committee to pay fees to the counsel appointed for respondent No.2.

Issues considered

What is the appropriate disposition of a bail application when the applicant chooses to withdraw it after the Court has indicated an unwillingness to entertain the application?

Subjects

bail
withdrawal
criminal procedure
High Court
application dismissed

Judgment

                                                     916 CriBA No.179.2026
                                    -1-

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

              CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 179 OF 2026

               SHRI SHUBHAM SHAILESH KAMBLE
                              VERSUS
             THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
                                 ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shrikant Jadhav i/b Mr. M. P. Kharat
APP for Respondent-State : Ms. A. A. Takalkar
Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Rahul R. Patil
                                 ...
                CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                     Date : 27th March, 2026
PER COURT :-


1.            After hearing the learned counsel for applicant at

length, when this Court was not inclined to entertain the

application, the learned counsel for applicant, on instructions,

seeks withdrawal of the application.


2.            Accordingly,   this   application   stands   dismissed   as

withdrawn.


3.            The Bombay High Court Legal Services Committee,

Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, to pay the fees to the learned counsel

appointed on behalf of respondent No. 2, as per rules.



                                          (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

Omkar Joshi

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…