Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VISHAL MURLIDHAR PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The High Court granted leave to withdraw the bail application and disposed of it as withdrawn, without hearing it on merits.

Summary

Vishal Murlidhar Patil filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. His counsel, Onkar Gurav, sought leave to withdraw the application and requested that the trial court expedite the trial and dispose of the case within one year, with liberty to file a fresh bail application if the trial was not concluded. The Court granted leave to withdraw, stating that the application would not be heard on its merits. It directed the trial court to endeavour to dispose of the case within the stipulated period. The bail application was therefore disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bail application may be withdrawn at the request of the applicant's counsel.
  • Whether the High Court can direct the trial court to expedite the trial within a specific timeframe.

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • expedited trial
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

              P.H. Jayani                                                           501 BA18.2026.doc


                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     BAIL APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2026

              Vishal Murlidhar Patil                                       …. Applicant
                    Vs.
              The State of Maharashtra and anr.                            …. Respondents

              Mr. Onkar Gurav i/b. Mr. Anjali Patil for the Applicant.
              Ms. Anagha Deshmukh, APP for Respondent No.1 – State.
              Ms. Sumaiya Khan, appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2.
              Ms. Anupama Patil, PSI, Dadar Police Station, present.

                                                  CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
                                                  DATED : 18th AUGUST, 2026

              P.C. :-

              1.        Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on production board.

              2.        Mr. Gurav, learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks

              leave to withdraw the aforesaid Bail Application and requested to direct the

              trial Court to expedite the hearing and dispose of the case within one year.

              Further, he seeks liberty to file a fresh bail Application, if the trial is not

              concluded within the said period.

              3.        Leave to withdraw is granted, with aforesaid liberty.

              4.        Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

              5.        It is made clear that this Application is not heard on merits.

              6.        The trial Court is requested to expedite the hearing of the case and

              endeavour to dispose of the same within one year.



       Digitally
       signed by
                                                             (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
       PREETI
PREETI HEERO
HEERO JAYANI
JAYANI Date:
       2026.08.19
       19:53:09
       +0530

                                                                                                  1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.