Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJU RAMBHAU MARGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the bail application with liberty to file a fresh application if there is no substantive progress in the trial after five months.

Summary

Raju Rambhau Margale filed a criminal bail application before the High Court of Bombay. The trial was ongoing with only five witnesses remaining to be examined. The State counsel submitted that the trial was in progress. On behalf of the applicant, counsel sought leave to withdraw the bail application, reserving the right to file a fresh application if the trial did not make substantive progress within five months. The Court permitted the withdrawal with that liberty and ordered that all pending applications be disposed of. No statutory provisions or precedents were cited.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bail application may be withdrawn with liberty to refile if the trial does not make substantive progress within a specified period

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • trial progress

Judgment

                                                                                                  62-BA-181-2026.doc



                             N.S.Kamble


                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 181 OF 2026


                             Raju Rambhau Margale                                           … Applicant
                                   Versus
                             The State of Maharashtra                                       … Respondent
          Digitally signed
NILAM     by NILAM
SANTOSH
          SANTOSH
          KAMBLE
                             ____________________________________________________________
KAMBLE    Date: 2026.02.18
          15:23:15 +0530
                             Mr.Satyavrat Joshi i/b Mr.Samay Pawar, for the Applicant.
                             Mr.P.P. Jadhav, APP for Respondent-State.
                             ____________________________________________________________
                                                                CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                DATE           :     17th FEBRUARY 2026

                             P.C. :

                             .            Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP.
                             2.           The learned APP submit that trial is in progress. Only five
                             witnesses are remain to be examined.
                             3.           Considering the submissions of the APP, the learned counsel for
                             the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this Application with
                             liberty to file fresh Application, if there is no substantive progress in the trial
                             after five months.
                             4.           Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the
                             Applicant, the Application is allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid
                             liberty.
                             5.           All pending Applications are disposed of.

                                                                                   (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

                                                                 Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.