Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KRUSHNA ARUN SHINGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
APPLICATION ALLOWED

Holding

The title clause must be read as "BAIL APPLICATION" and the order corrected accordingly.

Summary

The High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a bail application (No. 1813 of 2026) filed by Krushna Arun Shingare against the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that the earlier order dated 1st October 2026 mistakenly referred to the proceeding as a "CRIMINAL APPLICATION". The judge directed that the title clause be read as "BAIL APPLICATION". Accordingly, the order was to be corrected and the revised order uploaded. No substantive discussion on bail merits was made; the order was purely corrective.

Issues considered

  • Whether the title clause "CRIMINAL APPLICATION" should be interpreted as "BAIL APPLICATION" in the order dated 1st October 2026

Subjects

  • bail
  • order correction
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:46310
                 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
                                                                                      supmo

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1813 OF 2026

            Krushna Arun Shingare                                   ... Applicant
            Versus
            The State of Maharashtra                                ... Respondent

                                         CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAONKAR, J.
                                            Dated : 5th October, 2026
            Suo motu order


            1.              This is for speaking to the minutes of the order in the

            dated 1st October, 2026 in the above Bail application.


            2.          In the title clause of the order "CRIMINAL APPLICATION” be

            read as “BAIL APPLICATION”


            3.         Order to stand corrected accordingly and corrected order be

            uploaded.




                                                                ( HITEN S. VENEGAONKAR, J.)
 JPChavan




                                                                                      1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.