Bombay High Court
KRUSHNA ARUN SHINGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The title clause must be read as "BAIL APPLICATION" and the order corrected accordingly.
Summary
The High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a bail application (No. 1813 of 2026) filed by Krushna Arun Shingare against the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that the earlier order dated 1st October 2026 mistakenly referred to the proceeding as a "CRIMINAL APPLICATION". The judge directed that the title clause be read as "BAIL APPLICATION". Accordingly, the order was to be corrected and the revised order uploaded. No substantive discussion on bail merits was made; the order was purely corrective.
Issues considered
- Whether the title clause "CRIMINAL APPLICATION" should be interpreted as "BAIL APPLICATION" in the order dated 1st October 2026
Subjects
- bail
- order correction
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:46310
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
supmo
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1813 OF 2026
Krushna Arun Shingare ... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAONKAR, J.
Dated : 5th October, 2026
Suo motu order
1. This is for speaking to the minutes of the order in the
dated 1st October, 2026 in the above Bail application.
2. In the title clause of the order "CRIMINAL APPLICATION” be
read as “BAIL APPLICATION”
3. Order to stand corrected accordingly and corrected order be
uploaded.
( HITEN S. VENEGAONKAR, J.)
JPChavan
1 of 1
Checking your session…