Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAJVAL ALIAS GAJYA PRAKASH NAYDUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The Court held that leave to amend the prayer clause is granted and the typographical error in the operative order must be corrected.

Summary

The applicant, Prajval alias Gajya Prakash Naydu, filed a criminal bail application. His counsel sought leave to amend the prayer clause of the application and to be heard on the minutes of an order dated 18/03/2026. The Court granted leave for the amendment to be made immediately. The counsel also pointed out a typographical error in paragraph 1 and clause II of the operative order, where the case reference was incorrectly printed as ‘C.R. No. 38/2025’ instead of ‘C.R. No. 85/2025’. The Court ordered that the necessary corrections be effected. Consequently, the application for amendment was allowed and the clerical mistake was rectified.

Issues considered

  • Whether leave can be granted to amend the prayer clause in a criminal bail application.
  • Whether a typographical error in the operative order can be corrected by the Court.

Subjects

  • bail
  • amendment
  • typographical error
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                                191-26-ba.doc


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 191 OF 2026
                                      Prajval Alias Gajya Prakash Naydu
                                                      Vs.
                                      The State of Maharashtra and anr

                   Mr. Vikram Patil, advocate for the applicant

                                                   CORAM :        SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                                   DATE :         25th MARCH, 2026.

                   P. C. :

                   1.        Not on board. Taken on board.

                   2.        Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to amend the

                   prayer clause and prays for speaking to minutes of order dated

                   18/03/2026.

                   3.        Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

                   4.        Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is a

                   typographical error in paragraph no. 1 and in clause II of operative
IRESH
MASHAL
                   order as inadvertently ‘C.R. No. 38/2025’ is typed instead of ‘C.R.
Digitally signed
by IRESH
MASHAL
Date:
2026.03.26
                   No. 85/2025’.
18:59:38
+0530



                   5.        Accordingly, necessary corrections be carried out in paragraph

                   no. 1 and clause II of operative order.


                                                               [SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.]


                   Iresh                              1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.