Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJ @ BARKYA PRAMOD SATHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Bail is granted to the applicant subject to stringent conditions.

Summary

The applicant, Raj @ Barkya Pramod Sathe, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences including dacoity (IPC s.399), criminal breach of trust (IPC s.406), several provisions of the Arms Act and the Maharashtra Police Act. He had been in custody for nearly three years pending trial for a case registered on 26‑12‑2023, where he and four others were alleged to have planned a dacoity, with one co‑accused still absconding. The court considered the length of pre‑trial detention, the applicant’s status as a young offender, and the absence of any finding on the merits of the case. It held that bail could be granted despite the serious nature of the charges, provided strict conditions were imposed to prevent tampering with evidence or witnesses. The bail was ordered on a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with sureties and numerous reporting and conduct conditions. The order expressly limited its observations to bail and noted that the trial would proceed on the evidence alone.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail may be granted under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, for offences punishable under IPC sections 399 and 406, the Arms Act and the Maharashtra Police Act despite the seriousness of the alleged dacoity.
  • Whether the applicant’s prolonged pre‑trial detention of almost three years justifies bail on humanitarian and legal grounds.
  • Whether the applicant poses a risk of influencing witnesses, tampering with evidence, or fleeing the jurisdiction.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • pre‑trial detention
  • dacoity
  • criminal breach of trust
  • Arms Act
  • Maharashtra Police Act
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Section 483
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                                                               73.BA.1921.2026.doc

Ajay

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1921 OF 2026

       Raj @ Barkya Pramod Sathe                          .. Applicant
             Versus
       State of Maharashtra                               .. Respondent
                                  ....................
        Mr. Ibrahim A. Shaikh, Advocate for Applicant.
        Ms. Anuja S. Gotad, APP for Respondent – State.
        API – Mr. Sharad Waghale, Talegaon Dabhade Police Station
         present.
                                   ......…...........

                                   CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                   DATE        : SEPTEMBER 22, 2026.

       P.C.:

       1.       Heard Mr. Shaikh, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms.

       Gotad, learned APP for Respondent – State.


       2.       This is an Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya

       Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking bail in

       connection with C.R.No.646 of 2023 registered with Talegaon

       Dabhade Police Station, District Pune for offences punishable under

       Sections 399 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’);

       Sections 3(25), 4(27), 27 and 35 of the Arms Act and Section 37 and

       135 of the Maharashtra Police Act.


       3.       Applicant is incarcerated for the past almost three years

       pending trial. The indictment and arrest of Applicant is on the ground


                                                                           1 of 4
                                                          73.BA.1921.2026.doc


that he as well as other 4 persons were planning to commit dacoity.

They were apprehended from an open space behind Gorawadi Railway

Station in Talegaon Dabhade area at 02:35 p.m. in the afternoon on

the 26.12.2023 and taken into custody. Two juveniles and three adults

are involved as accused in the present crime, out of whom one adult

accused is absconding.


4.        Applicant is a young offender. Applicant has persuaded the

Court to consider releasing him on bail since the complicity of

Applicant to commit the crime would be otherwise a matter of trial.

Considering the long incarceration of Applicant for almost three years

and the ignominy of the trial not commencing or for that matter not

being concluded in the near foreseeable future persuades me to

consider the Application for grant of bail. The applicant is granted bail.


5.        Hence, in view of above prima facie observations and

findings, Bail Application of Applicant is allowed subject to the

following terms and conditions:-


          (i)   Applicant – Raj @ Barkya Pramod Sathe is directed to

                be immediately released from prison in connection with

                CR. No.646 of 2023;


          (ii) Applicant is directed to be released on bail on

                furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five

                Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like

                                                                      2 of 4
                                               73.BA.1921.2026.doc


     amount;


(iii) Applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer at

     Talegaon Dabhade Police Station, once every month, on

     the first Sunday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to

     12:00 p.m. until commencement of trial and thereafter

     shall attend all dates of hearing before the Trial Court;


(iv) Applicant shall cooperate with the conduct of the trial

     and remain present before the Trial Court on all dates,

     unless specifically exempted. Applicant shall not seek

     unnecessary adjournments. Any such conduct shall

     entitle the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail;


(v) Applicant shall not leave the State of Maharashtra

     without prior permission of the Trial Court;


(vi) Applicant shall not influence any of the witnesses or

     tamper with the evidence in any manner;


(vii) Applicant shall keep the Investigating Officer informed

     of his current residential address and mobile telephone

     number and shall forthwith inform the Investigating

     Officer of any change in his residential address or

     mobile telephone number, as and when such change

     occurs; and



                                                           3 of 4
                                                                                       73.BA.1921.2026.doc


                                        (viii)Any breach or infraction of any of the aforesaid

                                             conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail granted to

                                             the Applicant.


                              6.        It is clarified that the observations made in this order are

                              limited for the purpose of granting bail only and I have not made any

                              observations on merits of the case. The trial shall be adjudicated on

                              the strength of the evidence led and strictly on its own merits being

                              uninfluenced with any of the prima facie observations made

                              hereinabove in this order.


                              7.        Bail Application is allowed and disposed in the above terms.




                                                                         [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

        Ajay
           Digitally signed
           by AJAY
AJAY       TRAMBAK
TRAMBAK    UGALMUGALE
UGALMUGALE Date:
           2026.09.22
           20:24:58 +0530




                                                                                                   4 of 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.